Doors is a low poly minimalist logic puzzle game where you wander around some fairly stock-asset looking environments until you come to a set of doors which are adorned with statements. You must deduce which door is the logically "true" door and pass through it to get to the next puzzle question, that's all there is to this. Unclear why this wasn't just a set of questions on a website, instead of having a lazy low poly minimalist Unity level wrapped around it, but then I guess a web page can't be a cash grab unless you dump some Unity assets on it and put it on Steam.
What bugs me most about this is that it's a game with only one job, to provide logic puzzles, but the developers goofed and the logic puzzles don't actually work. Putting aside the faulty premise that bacon always gives happiness (this is not true), some of the logic puzzles are also simply wrong. One example, you're presented with one choice between two doors. The "correct" door says "Both doors lead to death", which is of course UNTRUE as that door does not lead to death, thus both doors do not lead to death. The developers had ONE JOB here and they goofed it up completely.
From a technical perspective, the game doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard.
The game features lazy minimalist/untextured low-polygon "retro" assets and visuals, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the early 1990s. The lack of textures is a method that lazy devs often use to disguise their lack of talent/interest in doing the graphics properly and trying to disguise it under the name of "art", or "We made it look bad on purpose", which really isn't something gamers should have to put up with. It's unclear why the developers weren't willing to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets and high resolution textures for the game. It looks bad as a result of their decisions, and that's just another reason to avoid it.
Bewilderingly, the game doesn't include proper audio controls, so you can't turn off the annoying background music, you'll need to alt+tab out and stop the music using the Windows sound mixer. This is obviously not okay and it's unclear why the developers chose not to include this basic feature.
The controls can't be customised, which will be an annoyance for many, but it can also render the game unplayable for differently-abled gamers, or gamers using AZERTY or other international keyboard layouts.
These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game.
Reviewing SteamDB to check how popular this game was with players reveals a surprise... there's a very healthy spike in player counts for the game. But this only happened once, around the same time that trading cards were applied to the game... so this is just card idlers getting their cards and moving on. A closer look at the numbers shows the game just has a couple of players every week running up the game and idling it for cards, then deleting it. We must ask how it benefits gamers for there to be so many games like this, with no merit as a serious game, that only generate sales from people idling and selling the trading cards.
This game features a number of suspicious, glowing with praise day 0 reviews. They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear at almost exactly the same time, very shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game. However, after that 0 day spike in player counts and reviews, next to nobody bothered to play the game. This is incredibly inconsistent and just doesn't happen naturally. The "Positive" review score on this game should be taken with a grain of salt.
Doors has the gamer gouging price of $5 USD, for which you could easily get any number of older AAA games. This is also competing with over 9,000 free games available on Steam, many of them far better than this paid product. Given the defects and quality issues with the game, coupled with the unrealistic price, and the questionable ethical nature of the developer and/or their associates (as outlined above), this is impossible to recommend.
