
Do you have what it takes to become President of the United States? Can you win the Two Seventy (270) Electoral Votes needed for victory in the US Election?
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. The player count below is how many people own it, not what they spent.
Prices
The United States storefront in every case, so this compares stores and not countries.
About
Stats
Languages: English
Sums Steam + Google Play
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | Free | 1.1Kreviews | 76% | — | $0 |
| Free | 17.4Kratings | 85% | — | $4.2M |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 51 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
игра для тренировки русских агентов
Игрок участвует в президентских выборах США: распределяет бюджет кампании, борется за голоса выборщиков в штатах, взаимодействует с группами интересов и соперничает с оппонентами. Цель — набрать 270 голосов выборщиков для победы. Плюсы: Образовательный элемент. Помогает понять систему выборов США и роль голосов выборщиков. Стратегическая глубина. Нужно грамотно распределять бюджет, выбирать ключевые штаты и лоббировать интересы групп. Несколько режимов. Одиночная игра против ботов и мультиплеер (PvP). Реалистичная карта. Штаты имеют разное количество голосов выборщиков и стоимость кампании. Бесплатно. Базовый доступ без финансовых вложений. Короткие сессии. Один раунд можно завершить за 30–60 минут. Минусы: Слабый онлайн. Мультиплеер малоактивен — сложно найти живых соперников. Внутриигровые покупки. Предлагают преимущества, которые могут влиять на баланс. Упрощённая модель политики. Взаимодействие с группами интересов и штатами схематично, не отражает всей сложности реальных выборов. Неравномерная сложность ботов. Некоторые ИИ‑оппоненты (например, Хиллари) играют заметно сильнее других. Ограниченный набор кандидатов. Мало доступных политиков, особенно среди демократов. Устаревшая графика. Визуальный стиль выглядит просто и не обновлялся с релиза. Итог 270 | Two Seventy US Election — доступный политический симулятор для тех, кто хочет попробовать себя в роли кандидата на пост президента США. Игра даёт базовое представление о системе выборщиков и предлагает стратегические задачи, но из‑за неактивного мультиплеера, внутриигровых покупок и упрощённой механики вряд ли подойдёт тем, кто ищет глубокий и реалистичный опыт.
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Hours played at review time, across 51 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Very fun election game, somewhat realistic. Easy to understand and play.
Game wont start anymore...
♥♥♥♥ this ♥♥♥♥♥ ass game
R.I.P.
If you are looking for a deep, immersive political strategy game that captures the high-stakes drama of a presidential campaign, keep looking. 270 US Election is less of a video game and more of a glorified, premium-priced spreadsheet simulator. While the core mechanics have some merit, the aggressive monetization completely ruins the experience. The Good: A Decent Edutainment Tool To be entirely fair, if you somehow manage to unlock the entire game, it functions as a perfectly fine edutainment title. It teaches you the basics of the Electoral College, state demographics, and the tactical push-and-pull of campaign spending. For a high school civics class or a casual political junkie, the underlying math and map-conquering strategy can be genuinely engaging for a few hours. The Bad: Budget Presentation Unfortunately, getting to that fun is a chore because the presentation is incredibly bare-bones. You are essentially paying to stare at static maps and menus. It plays like a budget mobile port rather than a fully realized strategy game. There are no dynamic events, no deep narrative hooks, and very little visual flair. It is numbers going up and down on a screen. The Ugly: 75% of the Game is Paywalled The absolute killer here is the microtransactions. You download the game thinking you're getting a complete experience, only to realize that roughly three-quarters of the content is aggressively locked behind a paywall. Want to play different historical scenarios, use various candidates, or access core strategic features? Get your wallet out. It is incredibly frustrating to feel like you’ve bought a demo, only to be constantly nagged to spend more money just to make the game whole.
The pay for it is within the game, most things locked behind payment, you dont have any customizability.
trump will deport all the niqqers
The basic idea behind 270 | Two Seventy is actually pretty fun, but the free-to-play design gets in the way. Playing by yourself quickly becomes repetitive, while a lot of the experience seems designed around multiplayer and pushing you toward in-app purchases. It feels less like a proper strategy game and more like a mobile-style free-to-play game that happens to be on Steam. The Steam achievements are a nice addition, but the monetization and limited single-player experience make it difficult to recommend.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0 | 73.9K | 91% | Free | |
| $0 | 1K | 82% | Free | |
| $29.2M | 26.9K | 66% | $39.99 | |
| $29.9M | 29.5K | 88% | $39.99 | |
| $7.2M | 7.3K | 74% | $24.99 | |
| $7.1M | 6.4K | 82% | $29.99 |