
WWII GI is the invasion of Normandy. The paranoia. The fear. the intensity that was D-Day. You will experience it first hand.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0/day in the week to Sep 10 → 0/day in the week after.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0/day in the week to Jul 25 → 0/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 26 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 7 places towards #1, and the 2,400 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
About
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Sums Steam only; GOG publishes no volume signal, so the true total is higher by an unknown amount.
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | $1.39−80% | 82reviews | 45% | — | $2.4K |
| $1.39−80% | 23ratings | 58% | — | not modelled |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 42 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
This game is suckass because of many details in this game
Do not buy this, there are plenty of Duke Nukem style shooters AND World War II shooters out there which are more fun, more accessible and more graphically pleasing - even in early 1990-s standards. By "accessible" I mean a game that is actually playable by a person who is not a hardcore FPS player, who doesn't do anything in their free time apart from playing FPS. I can play Doom on Medium just fine, but in this game I'm instantly killed and the graphical glitches don't motivate me to proceed figuring out what am I doing wrong.
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Hours played at review time, across 42 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
World War II GI is a late-1990s first-person shooter developed by TNT Team and now preserved on Steam through Ziggurat, and it serves as both a time capsule of Build-engine design and a reflection of how early PC shooters interpreted historical warfare. Released during a period when military shooters were still discovering their modern identity, it presents World War II through the lens of fast, arcade-style action rather than scripted cinematics or realism. The game loosely follows American soldiers fighting across France after D-Day, using brief mission text and transitional screens to frame each level. There’s no cinematic storytelling or character development—narrative functions mostly as thematic backdrop—but the immediacy of the premise establishes the necessary context and keeps the pacing brisk. The gameplay structure clearly inherits its DNA from Duke Nukem 3D, NAM, and other Build-engine shooters. Movement is quick, weapons fire rapidly, and levels become miniature mazes filled with enemies, switches, explosive hazards, hidden stashes, and keycard-gated objectives. Combat prioritizes reflexes over tactical planning, and firefights can become chaotic as enemies swarm from unexpected angles. While the environments reference real-world locations—trenches, occupied towns, bunkers, factories—they are designed with 90s FPS abstraction rather than strict historical layout, creating an exaggerated battlefield that rewards exploration and spatial awareness. The game offers little hand-holding, leaving players to decipher level progression, locate keys, and survive without generous checkpoints or regeneration. Weapon variety anchors the experience. The arsenal includes recognizable World War II firearms—pistols, rifles, automatic weapons, grenades, and flamethrowers—each exaggerated for arcade impact. They lack the weighty recoil and sound design associated with modern shooters, but their simplicity fits the game’s pacing. Enemies, meanwhile, consist mostly of German soldiers with hitscan attacks, making encounters punishing if players remain exposed for even a few seconds. AI is basic and sometimes unfair, but in the context of classic FPS design, it contributes to the tense, twitch-based rhythm. Health and ammo management become essential resources, especially on higher difficulties, and careless rushing can cause abrupt, surprising deaths. Level design remains one of the game’s most interesting elements. TNT Team built environments filled with destructible props, ambushes, interconnected passages, and optional secrets that offer meaningful rewards. The maps strike a balance between linear combat routes and exploratory diversions, encouraging players to search for medkits, armor, or hidden supply caches. However, some levels include obtuse progression blocks or visual clarity issues—switches that blend into walls, maze-like layouts lacking guiding landmarks, or objectives communicated only through trial and error. These quirks speak to the era’s design philosophy—rewarding persistence and memorization—but may frustrate modern players expecting more navigational guidance. Visually, World War II GI reflects both the strengths and limitations of the Build engine near the end of its technological life. Character sprites, environmental textures, and weapon artwork are functional but lack the artistic detail of contemporary shooters like Half-Life or Unreal. Yet the gritty, low-resolution aesthetic unexpectedly enhances the tone, capturing a grim wartime mood despite technical constraints. Lighting remains mostly static, and animations are minimal, but the environments carry a surprising sense of atmosphere thanks to rubble-strewn streets, barbed wire, explosions, and ambient battlefield clutter. The soundtrack consists of tense, militaristic compositions mixed with silence to increase suspense, while weapon and enemy audio provide sharp, recognizable feedback even if they sound dated today. As a Steam release, the game benefits from preservation rather than reinvention. Ziggurat’s version focuses on compatibility—ensuring the game runs smoothly on modern hardware—rather than adding enhancements, high-resolution assets, or accessibility features. This means players receive an authentic experience, complete with its rough edges, sudden difficulty spikes, and occasionally clunky controls. For genre enthusiasts, this authenticity is appealing, as it allows the game to be appreciated within its historical context. For others, especially players discovering it without nostalgia, the lack of modernization may feel limiting. World War II GI’s weaknesses stem mostly from age and ambition. The enemy variety is limited, mission objectives rarely evolve beyond reach-the-exit or retrieve-the-item tasks, and the storytelling lacks emotional engagement. The hit detection and movement can feel inconsistent, particularly compared to smoother Build-engine shooters. Difficulty balance fluctuates wildly between levels, sometimes overwhelming players without proper preparation. These elements reveal the game’s budget constraints and the transitional state of FPS design during its release era. Yet despite these flaws, the game possesses enduring charm. Its earnest attempt to translate World War II into a high-energy shooter predates the cinematic realism of Medal of Honor or Call of Duty, offering instead a uniquely retro interpretation—one defined by mechanical urgency rather than scripted spectacle. For fans of classic shooters, the combination of fast combat, puzzle-like level navigation, and unapologetically old-school design creates a satisfying challenge. As a historical artifact, it provides valuable insight into how developers approached war storytelling before the genre matured. Ultimately, World War II GI succeeds as a preserved slice of FPS history rather than a modern reinterpretation of wartime action. It rewards players who appreciate retro design, Build-engine experimentation, and the raw, unpolished energy of 90s shooters. Those seeking realism, narrative depth, or contemporary production values may struggle to connect with it, but enthusiasts of classic PC gaming will find a scrappy, nostalgic, and surprisingly engaging experience. Its existence on Steam ensures that a lesser-known chapter of shooter history remains accessible—and for players interested in tracing the evolution of wartime FPS design, that alone makes it worth exploring. Rating: 5/10
Не прошёл Не рекомендую Система аптечек тут просто ужас. Чтобы лечится нужно принят аптечку, вертеться и приседать. Перемещение и прыжок = аптечку использовал в пустую. В целом, я ожидал уровня NAM. Хоть и есть прогресс, например игра меньше стала напоминать простой рескин Duke Nukem 3D (хотя прогресс в этом небольшой). Но получилось не то, что я ожидал. Единственное, что мне понравилось, это главная тема аддона Platoon Leader, который идёт в комплекте.
This is a build engine game. (Duke Nukem 3D, Shadow Warrior, Blood, etc.)... WW2-GI is a pseudo-sequel/pseudo-remake of an earlier total conversion for Duke Nukem 3D called Platoon TC.
Super retro perełka ta gra, ale słabe jest wypuszczanie za kasę na Steam gier abandonware chodzących pod emulatorem DOSBoxa i do tego TOTALNIE nie przystosowanej do gry na współczesnym sprzęcie. Skoro do usprawnienia tego trzeba i tak zabawy jak przy konfiguracji każdego jednego emulatora, to lepiej poszukać ogólnie dostępnego darmowo ROMa i grać w to w RetroArch.
This game isnt really bad most of the time, its just really challenging. You can get killed by a single bullet fired from a bush miles away, by a random artillery shot or air raid that just happens to land on you, or by those damn mines scattered everywhere. But when you think about it, thats realistic. Thats what what war is like. You can be the best soldier out there, but a singe unlucky move and youre finished. If you need to heal yourself youll literally have to stop moving completely and use the medkit for 10 seconds. Its realistic, but boy can it get annoying. Prepare to save/load your game every other minute unless you got the reflexes of a fighter pilot. There are a few levels that are just bad and annoying. Youll be caught in crossfire by the op enemies and the tanks in this game are just the most irritating thing ever. But it isnt the couple of bad levels that make this game hard to enjoy, its the damn CONTROLS. Theyre just terrible. Thats right, the smart butts who brought this game to steam thought it was a wonderful idea to not improve the og controls at all so you cant move even nearly as easily as in games like Duke Nukem or Shadow Warrior. Its possible to make the control somehow bareable by using the Dosbox keymapper (use ctrl+f1 to open the mapper and see a online tutorial on how to use it) but they still degrade the experience alot. Someone also said that this game "runs like ahh" but personally i think it runs just fine. I still think this game is somehow a bit worse than "NAM" the Vietnam War game made by the same guys. I feel like this one has more bad levels and less pleasing aesthetics.
[h1]Rating[/h1] 2/10 [h1]Intro[/h1] It's exactly the same as NAM, it's just that the setting is World War. Virtually nothing was done to make an improvement over that game. Once again, I recommend playing Duke Nukem 3D, Ion Fury or Shadow Warrior instead. [h1]Positives[/h1] + Weapons have good impact. [h1]Negatives[/h1] - Poor level design. - Poor aesthetics and graphics. - Random explosions can kill you. - Every enemy is an overpowered hit-scanner. Eduke32: https://www.eduke32.com/
Even worse than NAM but for different reasons. The weapons are really inaccurate and the morale system makes them lose accuracy as you take hits. Dealing with the tanks can be tricky so make sure to save those explosives. The last maps are the worst as you need to snipe the enemies with your inaccurate weapons and the ammo is not plentiful either. About as fun as munching on a brick.
fps bellino per sue epoca lo consiglio per appassionati altri po meno
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.4K | 85 | 95% | $1.99 | |
| $2.4K | 100 | 94% | $0.99 | |
| $2.4K | 57 | 88% | $2.99 | |
| $2.4K | 66 | 59% | $1.99 | |
| $2.4K | 171 | 56% | $0.89 | |
| $2.4K | 52 | 96% | $1.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1M | 9.3K | 93% | $4.99 | |
| $818.3K | 7.4K | 90% | $4.99 | |
| $518K | 4.4K | 93% | $4.99 | |
| $6.5K | 64 | 86% | $4.99 | |
| $1.9K | 25 | 84% | $4.99 | |
| $1.2K | 3 | 0% | $14.99 |