[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b]
This game contains no meaningful single player content. There are no available servers and no player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote]
"WARMONGER:45" is one of literally thousands of student projects infesting Steam. It's from Neumont College of Computer Science in Salt Lake City, Utah. While student projects tend to be better quality than most "amateur" made games, we must still question what value such projects have for gamers. As with all student projects, this isn't really a fully fleshed out game, it's just the result of an academic exercise, and as such it has much more limited value as a game than a professionally developed game would have.
Educational institutions should not be using Steam as a dumping ground for homework assignments (especially if the students didn't even pass the course). Sure, it helps their marketing and helps the students feel good about themselves, but this is another case of a business putting themselves before the needs of gamers.
The students were taught, incorrectly, that "PvP IS content" so they assumed players will make themselves into content for the game, rather that creating bespoke content. Leaving a dead, contentless PvP arena shooter that nobody played.
In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 3 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away.
And let's stop for a minute and think about that... 3 concurrent players. This is in a train wreck that boasts "30 vs 30 player PVP combat". What does that mean? Once, and only once, there was an actual game, with 2 people on one side and one guy on the other? And that only happened once?
Holy crap... that's beyond disastrous failure.
The graphics aren't great, mismatched looking graphics with low poly assets in many places, and poor quality assets everywhere else... combined with little to no meaningful graphics settings, of course. That's understandably a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. You deserve better than compromises.
Now on to pricing and value for gamers.
It would be unethical for students to try charge money for their homework assignments, so you don't have to pay any money for this. But you'd still have to spend your time downloading this, and "time is money", as they say.
There's the other problem, too... as a student project, this wasn't made for gamers. There's no requirement for them to polish and balance the game properly, all they need is something to show the faculty so they can get their grade and move on. Let's once more ask... why is that good for gamers?
It's obviously not delivering a solid product. Yet here it is, on the store page, and here you are, reading my review for a student demo that's going to waste your time. While genuine amateur developers who made real products get ignored because they have to compete with this stuff.
In some ways, this deluge of student projects on Steam is harmful to everyone.
Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it?
I think it's best to skip this download. While it won't necessarily cost you money, the time and hard drive space it requires could be better invested in one of the many higher-quality alternatives on Steam.
