Third

免费 没中文 没成就 第三序章 备注 本作是 2022 年秋季犹他大学 EAE 3720 课程的学生项目。 关于此游戏 你在一间房间中醒来。一名男子通过扬声器向你问好，并邀请你参与一场实验游戏。 可这场游戏并非你想象的那样，你似乎被刻意困在了这里。 你必须解开谜题、设法逃脱，而游戏的设计者则不断试图欺骗你。 随着实验不断深入，你会发现，还有别的地方不对劲…… 《第三序章》的灵感来自《见证者》《史丹利的寓言》与《意识形态的崇高客体》，是一款 2D 俯视角冒险游戏。 探索无尽的循环，揭开这场邪恶实验最深处的秘密。

... REPLACE WITH ACTUAL TEXT went right (->) from that room, restarted? did the same thing over. The text was buggy, as everything in the textbox was repeated twice. Got to the credits with the blue-red-black box (logo). When I finally restarted with the announcer saying "pity, you had the chance to escape but the chance is long gone... (blah blah, I don't remember)", the game crashed.

The developer is very hot. SMASH

[h1]興味を抱かせる仕組みが欲しい[/h1] 「この選択をするとどんな未来につながるんだろう」というのを楽しむタイプのゲームだとは思う。でもその選択そのものがたいして興味をそそられるものではなく冗長。3通りの方法でエンディングっぽい画面に遷移はできたが結末は無いようなもの。せめて実績があればルートを試そうと思う人も増えると思うが、どれだけのルートが存在するか分からず、それが興味深いものではないので厳しいと感じた。

It's a lazy Stanley Parable clone. It's really not a good idea to tell players that they consent to your program mining their personal information, even if it's meant to be a joke.

"Third" is a student project from University of Utah. One of the first things students should be taught in game development is that 3D graphics became mainstream in the mid 1990's with dedicated 3D cards like the Voodoo3 and the ATI Rage. But the students were deliberately mistaught that's it's okay to release obsolete 2D games in the 3D era of gaming... certainly any professional developer seeing a prospective new hire who doesn't even know about 3D gaming probably isn't going to give them a job. Needless to say if an educational institution taught me incorrectly on purpose, I'd ask for my money back. This is laughably bad for any student game. It's a minimalist "art" experience, not what could be called a real game, with minimalist, phoned in graphics... seriously, if any propsective employer saw this in an applicant's portfolio, not only would they kick them out of the interview, they'd take out a restraining order. University of Utah should be ashamed by this and possibly have their credentials reviewed... this is laughably bad. The idea is that you participate in a mad scientist type lab experimental game, where you must try to solve puzzles to escape while the creator attempts to fool you, eventually leading to the discovery that something else is wrong. And what is wrong is that someone seriously let a student think this garbage was okay to publish. This is not a game for publishing, this is a game for deleting. It would benefit humanity if the source code for this game was moved onto a flash drive which is then burned, the ashes collected and burned again, then shot into space, just to be sure. We also have to question what value there is for gamers on Steam when institutions flood the store with low quality 2D video game homework assignments... sure, it might make the students feel good about themselves, but this has no benefit for gamers who have to wade through this stuff to find professionally made 3D games. The game is quite short, and can be run through in just a few minutes or so. The lack of content here makes it hard to suggest it's worth spending the time to add to your library and download. This was made with the godawful "GameMaker Studio" construction kit/toolset, which is popular amongst amateur developers because it handholds you through making really crap 2D games that you can publish for $100 on Steam Direct. This lets you pat yourself on the back for pretending to be a real game developer, which explains why GameMaker Studio is responsible for so much ignored garbage on Steam. GameMaker Studio has never really been used to make a truly successful game, but that doesn't stop people from trying and failing. It's a particularly bad game engine that can only be used for making low quality 2D products. Like this. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, as the old saying goes. Another reason this particular game wasn't successful. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. It would be unethical for students to try charge money for their homework assignments, so you don't have to pay any money for this. But you'd still have to spend your time downloading this, and "time is money", as they say. There's the other problem, too... as a student project, this wasn't made for gamers. There's no requirement for them to polish and balance the game properly, all they need is something to show the faculty so they can get their grade and move on. Let's once more ask... why is that good for gamers? It's obviously not delivering a solid product. Yet here it is, on the store page, and here you are, reading my review for a student demo that's going to waste your time. While genuine amateur developers who made real products get ignored because they have to compete with this stuff. In some ways, this deluge of student projects on Steam is harmful to everyone. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 3 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. This isn't a complete game for gamers, and since it offers no profile benefits like a game collector badge, so I can't recommend adding it to your library.

[h1]Before I played Third, I had a small pp, no friends, no gf, depression, and no life. These things havent changed, but the game is pretty good[/h1]