
Shadows of War is a 2D Real-Time Strategy sidescroller game. The game combines classical RTS elements with new ideas into a 2D game.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About




Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 47 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
Crashes, lost saves, lags, bugs, poor mechanics
1) Как будто герцовка не синхронизируется 2) при открытии эскейп меню во время игры оно зависает в конец без возможности что-то нажать 2.2) настройки вообще никак не открываются во время игры(матча) 3) фон флаг имба конечно, но игра баганая до жути
ПОЛНАЯ ♥♥♥ ТА
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Hours played at review time, across 47 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
An absolute buggy mess of a game. You can't even pause it correctly. Trying to pause will have the audio freak out, and you'll be stuck in an infinite loop of it asking if you want to go back to the main menu. All while your troops are floating in the air, for some reason.
Shadows of Rage, best unit Special BUGs everywhere
100
just no. so buggy, only bought for flag
This is a popular kind of online strategy game and I thought the modern warfare focus and aesthetics looked promising....I was wrong. Because ultimately if the game is broken you can't really play it. The game crashed when simply trying to get to the main menu to restart a game. And when I "won" a game instead of it ending my units just disappeared and then 5 seconds later the enemy starts spawning units again.
Shadows of War, developed and published by TRI.G, is an experimental real-time strategy title that attempts to merge traditional RTS concepts with a side-scrolling 2D battlefield perspective. Rather than following the familiar top-down approach of most strategy games, it constrains action to horizontal lanes, forcing players to rethink unit placement, timing, and resource management within a more limited but continuous front line. This design choice immediately sets the game apart, giving it a distinct identity that feels closer to a tactical tug-of-war than a sprawling battlefield simulation. The game’s setting leans into a bleak, fictionalized vision of global conflict triggered by the discovery of a dangerous scientific project. While the narrative is not heavily foregrounded through cutscenes or dialogue, it provides a grim backdrop that frames each battle as part of a larger struggle for survival. The focus remains firmly on gameplay rather than storytelling, with the atmosphere communicated through environments, unit designs, and the relentless pace of warfare rather than explicit narrative exposition. Gameplay revolves around deploying and managing different unit types across wide horizontal maps. Infantry, vehicles, and support units must be produced and positioned carefully, as the side-view perspective limits vertical maneuvering and places greater emphasis on timing reinforcements and holding key sections of the front. Resource management plays a central role, as players must balance spending on new units with maintaining defensive pressure. Because the battlefield unfolds in real time, poor decisions can quickly snowball into overwhelming enemy advances, reinforcing the need for constant attention and adaptation. One of the more notable features is the inclusion of a Hardcore mode, which strips away many safety nets and starts players with extremely limited resources. In this mode, every unit matters, and mistakes are costly. It highlights the game’s intention to appeal to players who enjoy punishing, old-school strategy design where success depends on careful planning rather than generous mechanics or gradual power escalation. When the systems align, Hardcore mode can produce tense and rewarding encounters that emphasize efficiency and foresight. However, Shadows of War struggles significantly with execution. Many of its systems feel underdeveloped or poorly communicated, making the learning curve steeper than necessary. The user interface is often cited as unclear, with limited feedback about unit effectiveness, battlefield conditions, or imminent threats. This lack of clarity can make defeats feel confusing rather than instructive, undermining the strategic satisfaction that RTS players typically seek. Unit behavior can also feel inconsistent, with responsiveness issues that are especially noticeable in a genre where precision and timing are critical. Visually, the game adopts a functional but unremarkable 2D style. While serviceable, the graphics lack strong visual distinction, and large-scale battles can become cluttered, making it difficult to track units or understand the flow of combat at a glance. Sound design and music are similarly subdued, providing atmosphere without leaving much of an impression. The presentation does little to elevate the gameplay, instead reinforcing the impression of a low-budget project focused more on ideas than polish. Community reception reflects these issues clearly. While some players appreciate the originality of the side-scrolling RTS concept and the challenge offered by Hardcore mode, many others criticize the game’s balance, stability, and overall refinement. The negative reception does not stem from a lack of ambition, but rather from the feeling that the game needed more iteration and usability improvements to fully realize its concept. For many, the frustration outweighs the novelty. Ultimately, Shadows of War is a game defined by experimentation. Its attempt to hybridize RTS mechanics with a 2D side-view battlefield is intriguing and occasionally compelling, but the roughness of its systems and presentation prevents it from standing alongside more polished strategy titles. It may appeal to players who enjoy obscure or unconventional strategy games and are willing to tolerate frustration in exchange for novelty. For most RTS fans, however, it is likely to feel like an interesting idea that never quite achieved the refinement needed to become truly engaging. Rating: 4/10
PENG
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| INHUMAN | $8.3K | 112 | 63% | $3.99 |
| Cozy Solitaire | $8.3K | 143 | 85% | $2.79 |
| Evie | $8.3K | 184 | 46% | $2.99 |
| Absolute Alchemical Potion | $8.3K | 85 | 89% | $6.99 |
| Brazed | $8.3K | 63 | 52% | $4.99 |
| Luminosity | $8.3K | 63 | 84% | $4.99 |