
Meet the first standalone medieval battle royale game! Take part in battles with up to 50 players using a wide variety of weapons and other items.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
⠀
No one even playing lol.. 3 servers empty. Ill change my review when i can actually play.
This game is by no means the most well made game on the market, however there is a distinct novelty to Peasant Royale and it is a blast with friends. Would recommend! Plus its free!
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
it seems like fun, I'd really love to play it but.... there's never a single player in any servers so a match never starts.
no player base
Would be better if people actually played it this is the exact game i would like to play
"Peasant Royale" is a trash tier Unreal Marketplace asset flip claiming to be the first medieval battle royale (it's not). The developer took a bunch of Unreal Marketplace assets, dumped them on a game blueprint, and put his own name on other people's assets. At least he's not trying to get paid for it, which removes one of the nastier aspects of asset flipping. Regardless, the quality here is the same as any other asset flip, whether you pay money or not, so I can't recommend it. This has some fairly mediocre graphics that will understandably be a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. This is "free" enough, at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good. It's multiplayer only but of course no players, gamers can smell an asset flip from miles away. See, when developers don't know how to make their own game assets, when they aren't capable of doing that job, turns out they usually aren't capable of the rest of the job of game development either. Something that "Peasant Royale" illustrates very clearly. This is a mess. No wonder nobody wanted to play it. Even though this is "free", it failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at less than 100 concurrent players, and now there's basically nobody playing it. Even though it's free. This is a dismal public reception, but it's easy to see why gamers rejected it. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Nope. This isn't worth downloading. While this didn't cost me any money up front, I still feel ripped off.
Completely Dead.
This game is amazing people just don't know about it!!! need to spread the word and let's play!!!
I cant give you a positive review if u forgot about ur game. I had high hopes for this and you crushed my soul.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.