
KARDS, The World War II Card Game, combines traditional CCG gameplay with innovative mechanics inspired by classic strategy games and real battlefield tactics. Take command and challenge other players in grand-scale warfare on the ground, air, or seas.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About

Genres
Stats
Languages: English*, French*, German*, Polish*, Portuguese - Brazil*, Russian*, Simplified Chinese*, Italian*, Spanish - Spain*, Portuguese - Portugal*, Spanish - Latin America*, Traditional Chinese* +2 more
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 312 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 311 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
方法规划分局
太好玩了
狗屎平衡
好玩
冰岛人无父无母
cool stuff
这sm游戏是真上瘾
该游戏成功做到了不具有游戏性与完全不平衡,更新都是把玩家的的游戏体验变得更差,完全不顾玩家的体验,匹配机制稀烂,奖励敷衍,在每一次版本更新给英国日本加不讲道理的超模牌然后大削美苏德,新手无法上手且资源少,完全不推荐 This game has truly achieved the perfect combination of being utterly unplayable and completely unbalanced. Every update only makes the experience worse, showing total disregard for player feedback—the matchmaking is a mess, the rewards are stingy, and in every single patch, they add absurdly overpowered cards to Britain and Japan while heavily gutting the US, USSR, and Germany. New players can't get a foothold and resources are pitifully scarce, so I wouldn't recommend it at all.
这个游戏的二战气息十分浓厚,同时对于卡牌的设定也很好。
1939这次推出的活动真良心吧,打完后给的卡包爆率还挺高,一切都在蒸蒸日上口牙
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Engagement
DAU/MAU are modeled from peak concurrent players (≈×8 and ×28) — Steam publishes no active-user counts, so treat these as rough estimates, not reported figures.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Audience
Games most often reviewed by the same players — an audience-affinity signal from our review sample, not full ownership data.