Just War Trains

Such a unique concept, but there's just not much here really and the shooting mechanics aren't great. Make it so the environmental objects can be destroyed, add the ability to create custom maps, and work on the shooting mechanics a bit and this would be an interesting title. My review is admittedly biased because I couldn't find another player while checking this game out. I loaded it up on two computers and PvP'd myself. Keep that in mind if you do check it out -- you'll have to bring your own competitors.

Warm Trans

I wonder if this game have workshop thats very cool. please add workshop.

great game, why is there no player base. i am sad.

are you aware of the person standing behind you?

10/10 no notes

[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] The game had a novel concept, trains shooting other trains, that's new, but the implementation quality was through the floor... phoned in, amateurish hack job. It's no wonder this failed. And the AI slop marketing materials do not help... yes, we know when something is AI slop. So, "Just War Trains" is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. First and foremost, there's no meaningful single player content. The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the Game. They lost that bet. Without a huge community of players or single player content to add a lasting value to the game, the game dies. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for adding content to a game. In terms of visuals, this features fairly low quality low poly 3D graphics which will deter a lot of gamers, understandably. Gaming is a visual medium, and while some developers struggle with creating high quality visuals, failing to do so is a disservice to gamers. It's very difficult to recommend bad looking games. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. In terms of public reception, this failed to appeal to the 130 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at just a dozen or so concurrent players, and now there's basically nobody playing it. Even though it's free. This is a dismal public reception, but it's easy to see why gamers rejected it. It's important to note that, despite this being such a low quality product, there's a number of positive reviews that all appeared immediately after the game launched, from suspiciously inactive Steam accounts that have reviewed almost no other games apart from this. Take the review score of this game with a grain of salt. All other issues aside (any of which would disqualify this from being worth your time), this is a game that relies on other players for it to be viable, and because there's not enough players, it's not viable. I can't recommend anyone downloads this, it's basically dead.

The ultimate Competitive Casual Experience

This is a unique game for sure! Like if twisted metal were trains. Its Awesome!

AMAZING.