逆転探偵

Bu diyalog tabanlı gizem macerasında gerçeği ortaya çıkarmak için yapay zeka destekli köylülerle özgürce konuşun. Suçluyu tespit etmek için önemli tanıklıklar ve kanıtlar toplayın. Her oyun, çözülmesi gereken benzersiz bir vaka sunar!

[quote][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop][b]Warning: AI Slop[/b][/url] This game is partially or completely made with talentless, soulless AI generated content.[/quote] "逆転探偵" ("Ace Attack Detective") is AI slop, basically, from Japan. It's a minecraft graphics adventure game where you talk to NPCs backed by AI LLMs. There are HUGE problems with this. First up, LLMs aren't cheap, if this is backed by chatbots in cloud (AWS Bedrock etc) then there's either a set number of credits (which means the game will stop being playable) or playing this game costs the developer money... that's kinda funny. Secondly these chatbots ARE NOT PRIVATE. Just like the developers of the language models stole a bunch of copyrighted material and used it without permission to train their models, these LLMs also train based on user interaction with them... that makes this SPYWARE by proxy. Avoid playing this game for that reason. There's no English translation for the game, but that's okay. The language of bad games is universal. As mentioned, this features really godawful, "wrong" looking AI slop instead of genuinely and sincerely created game assets. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating real game assets or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks bad because of that decision. AI slop sticks out like a sore thumb... and it comes across as insulting. There's also the old adage that those who lack the budget and talent to make their own game assets usually lack the budget and talent to do the rest of the job of game development properly, too, and that's glaringly obvious here. This features lazy low-polygon voxel "Minecraft"-like "art", making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. A lot of amateur developers see Minecraft's success and assume it's because it looks bad, not because it had unique and appealing game mechanics, and they try to emulate the success without understanding it. It also happens to be easy, and doesn't need any proper talent in terms of game development/graphic artists etc. That's why reviewers are faced with so many of these terrible games with confrontingly bad graphics. Developers must learn that Minecraft succeeded despite the bad graphics, not because of them. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 130 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB shows this peaked at [b]only 2 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Given that this free game won't increase your game collector count, is it worth your time to add it to your library? This is a hard pass. There's no immediate financial commitment, but there are thousands of more compelling games on the platform that will give you a lot more enjoyment for your time. The use of AI slop is a direct insult to gamers and real, ethical content creators and artists everywhere.