
Use war, trade or diplomacy to satisfy your grandest ambitions and dominate five centuries of history in the newest version of Europa Universalis, Paradox Interactive's flagship historical grand strategy game.
Most likely between $31.6M and $89.5M. How we estimate →
Checked against 8 developer-reported games
Cheapest copy: ≈ $35.46 on Steam · China (−41%). Compare 15 prices in 15 markets →
Reviews
Themes across 1600 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
Merci pour ce jeu, peut être le sortir sans bug et avec une ia qui marche aurait été une bonne idée. Je déconseille l'achat en l'état, avec un peu de chances le jeu finira comme imperator Rome (abandonné). Bravo à paradox, hâte de payer 400 boules pour me corriger 4 bugs dans le prochain dlc.
欧陆风云,我有四不玩。 第一,大明我不玩,因为我仁。 大明三百年,设厂卫罗织构陷,宠阉党朝纲败坏;横征暴敛,苛捐杂税,百姓苦不堪言。 天下动荡,兴亡无常,君主沉迷修道求仙,此为不仁,故大明我不玩。大元更不仁,我也不玩。 第二,奥斯曼我不玩,因为我智。 奥斯曼国祚昌隆,西征欧罗巴,东略亚细亚;下君堡而需东西之脉,通商路以济陆海之利。 兵精粮足,天时地利人和,三战其三,可谓简单至极,玩多了会流出口水来,对智力开发极为不易。 此为不智也,故奥斯曼我不玩。 第三,英格兰我不玩,因为我理。 带英驰海为暴,劫掠商旅;开拓殖民,残虐土著;垄断贸易,横征远邦,恃强凌弱,唯利是图,无理之甚。 此为无理也,故英格兰我不玩。 第四,法兰西我不玩,因为我义。 法兰西兴教祸屠异己,诛杀新教血染巴黎;恃兵威而背盟约,屡侵邻邦,夺地掠财。 名为天主孝子,实为上帝逆儿;前拘教皇于阿维尼翁,后协异教以亵哈布斯堡。 此为不忠、不信、不孝、不义,故法兰西我不玩。
worst game of all time i wish i could get a refund
There's a lot that can be said good and bad, but the bottomline is that the game play is really boring. I try to pick up the game again, but game play is like watching grass grow. And the province control system plus game economy are so broken. You can't earn money unless you control provinces and you can't control provinces unless you pay big money for roads.
All they have done since release is nurf the fun out of the game and remover things they had at launch. I came back to play a Greenland into Vinland for an alt history playthrough. And they removed the possibility from the game nurfing one of the already weakest starts in the game. Outside the devs removing the little fun you can have the game as a whole is juts boring.
I do this for the good of Europa.
Why do I need the "feudalism" institution to mine iron? Tell that to the iron age tribes that caused the bronze age collapse almost 2000 years before feudalism was invented. At least give me a way to independently develop feudalism if you're going to do that. Seems like a very cheesy way of gating technological progression and is unnecessarily Eurocentric. Maybe I don't want to have to be forced to play as Europe all the time in every game.
Non mais arrêtez de casser ce jeu. Il est tout bonnement extraordinaire, j'ai torché le 4 et celui ci je compte bien aussi le jouer jusqu'au suivant.... Je ne comprend pas cette envie de casser un jeu, juste parcequ'on ne comprend pas son fonctionnement. Il est complexe mais si on s'y intéresse un temps soit peu, s'ouvre devant vous un monde de possibilité énorme avec les nombre de pays à jouer et leur mécaniques. N'hésitez pas, cassez vous un peu la tête pour le comprendre et il vous offrira bien plus que des heures de bonheur. Merci paradox et toute vos équipes.
As a big fan of Paradox games in general, and especially EU4, I just feel sad about this game. It aimed to be deeper and borrows mechanics from several different Paradox titles, but whereas in EU4 I never got bored, always found a cool nation to play, and tried to hunt achievements, etc., well in EU5, let's be honest, I'm bored. I have absolutely no desire to chase achievements, try out different nations, or simply play the game. That was my opinion at launch last year. And now, HOLD ON, plot twist! (Not at all). I gave the game another chance with the release of the Byzantium DLC, and well, I find Byzantium way more fun to play in EU4 than in EU5. Long story short, a disappointment... I will probably give it one last chance in 2027 and will update this review (or not) depending on the changes made to the game.
The economic system does not work and there is no indication there are any plans to fix it