
A new way to experience the battle royale genre! Choose a siege weapon, defend your castle, outwit and out-survive! In a death match elimination. After all enemies have fallen, if you're still alive, you win!
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About





Genres
Stats
Languages: English
Reviews
Battle Siege Royale is 20 years too late. The 2 weapons available have no animations, no wheel movement, no shooting animation, they skid like a drift car game. The concept had its charm, enough to give it a try, but well, no. It is a game where the scenarios should have a lot of physics, there are not, the few that there are are like a meme. I recorded 5 minutes to show. https://youtu.be/tLZxlt_XYnk
A new way to experience the battle royale genre! Choose a siege weapon, defend your castle, outwit and out-survive! In a death match elimination. After all enemies have fallen, if you're still alive, you win!
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time.
Kale savunmalı güzel bir strateji oyunu ben aşırı beğendim çok güzel duruyor.
[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There are no available servers and no player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] Battle Siege Royale is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. First and foremost, there's no meaningful single player content. The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the game. They lost that bet. Without a huge community of players or single player content to add a lasting value to the game, the game dies. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for adding content to a game. This weird "battle royale" game was abandoned very quickly by the developers, and features PvP arena fighting with one gimmick... you're an almost certainly asset flipped bit of autonomous, presumably possessed siege equipment (like a catapult or whatever). Which makes no sense as siege equipment really is just about bringing down walls, it's not primarily anti-infantry. Or anti-other-siege weaponry. Like... who's seiging other seige equipment? What a terrible idea for a game. No wonder it failed. The developers abandoned this 4 years and 9 months ago. It will never be completed. This unfinished game is just polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuinely, completely made games. The game graphics look better than you might expect, but that's just because it looks like some or all of them are "borrowed" from asset stores or wherever. Gamers can tell... and it comes across as insincere. There's also the old adage that those who lack the budget and talent to make their own game assets usually lack the budget and talent to do the rest of the job of game development properly, too. It's free for now, but the developer intends to charge for this if it ever leaves Early Access... but considering the poor public reception, it's likely this will not be one of the 25% of games that ever gets finished and leaves Early Access. Even though this is "free", it failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 3 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Nope. This isn't worth downloading. While this didn't cost me any money up front, I still feel ripped off.
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬛⬜⬜⬛⬛⬛⬜⬜⬛⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬛⬜⬜⬜⬜⬛⬜⬜⬜⬜⬛⬛⬜ ⬜⬛⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬛⬜ 🟦⬛🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦⬛🟦 🟦⬛🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦⬛🟦 🟦⬛⬛🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦⬛⬛🟦 🟦⬛⬛⬛🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦⬛⬛⬛🟦 🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥 🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥 🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥 🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
Игра 'Battle Siege Royale' - это неожиданно затягивающее сочетание tower defense и королевской битвы. Визуально игра довольно проста, но геймплей предлагает стратегическую глубину. Нужно грамотно расставлять бойцов и апгрейдить их, учитывая тип врагов и особенности местности. Большой плюс - это разнообразие юнитов с уникальными способностями, что позволяет экспериментировать с тактиками. Сражения быстрые и динамичные, что делает игру идеальной для коротких сессий. Есть ощущение прогресса, когда открываешь новых бойцов и улучшаешь старых. Мультяшный стиль приятный, но иногда не хватает полировки. Несмотря на некоторые шероховатости, игра очень увлекательная и стоит попробовать любителям жанра. Особенно радует возможность играть с друзьями в кооперативном режиме. Рекомендую!
免费 没中文 没成就 EA停更5年
☀️
fun and nice I love siege weapons
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.