100 KILLS CHALLENGE: ORIGINS

I'm playing Steam games in alphabetical order, and you can watch my review here: https://youtu.be/Bf2Va9q16Fg Prefer to read? There are two versions of this game, and this is the free version that comes with only 2 maps, and a few unlockable weapons. Not that it'll do you much good, as there aren't any dedicated servers and no players online. This is a FPS that harkens back to the original COD: Modern Warfare days, but with none of the polish that made those games fun. It's also riddled with bugs such as being able to stand against a wall and be out of bounds because your gun is poking through. The gun mechanics are okay, but the bots are literal aimbots, so good luck getting any enjoyment out of them. Unfortunately, this is basically just a dead, foundation level FPS. If you're curious about it, try a couple of rounds with friends - it is free after all - just don't expect much.

没意思，手感差，劣质的UI，总感觉是不知道哪里买来的魔性，但是连搞个像样点的UI都做不到

Donc ses points forts : - il y a des bots - gratuit Ses points faibles : - pas de joueur - on ne peut pas modifier les touches - copié collé de Call Of mais en moins bien - il n'y a qu'un seul mod de jeu (mêlée générale) N'oubliez pas de laisser un j'aime si tu trouve cet avis utile :)

This is not a good game... Only good gun is the shotty, which is busted. Phantom Forces in Roblox wins over this in every way. Did help me improve my aim in cod tho. 5/10

"100 KILLS CHALLENGE: ORIGINS" is a dead Unity asset flipped PvP arena fighter. There's bots, they're terrible, and no players. I don't know what goes through some developers minds... go on a shopping spree in the Unity asset store, arrange a couple of maps with "borrowed" assets, claim credit for all the work of the asset creators, try to use PvP as a substitute for content, and then someone become a rich and famous game developer. What really happens is that indie devs get a bad name and have to compete with all this pollution to find an audience for their genuinely made games. The game graphics look better than you might expect, but that's just because it looks like some or all of them are "borrowed" from asset stores or wherever. Gamers can tell... and it comes across as insincere. There's also the old adage that those who lack the budget and talent to make their own game assets usually lack the budget and talent to do the rest of the job of game development properly, too. This is "free" enough, at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good. Even though this is "free", it failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at just a dozen or so concurrent players, and now there's basically nobody playing it. Even though it's free. This is a dismal public reception, but it's easy to see why gamers rejected it. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.

на изи сделал 100 килов, жаль, но убийства своих не засчитывают (

Жена сказала если на этом обзоре будет 50 лайков и 10 наград, она купит ящик пива, мужики выручайте! My wife said if this review gets 50 likes and 10 awards, she will buy a case of beer, guys help me out!