The Home: Into The Woods

Ormanda gece, tamamen yalnızsın ya da öyle düşünüyorsun. Ağaçlarda bir şey hareket ediyor, sanki gerçek değilmiş gibi aralarında yürüyor ya da gerçek değil mi? Kabuslarına yenik düşmeden veya daha kötüsüne kapılmadan önce ormandan kaçmak için 5 çizim toplaman lazım. Begendim. tavsiye ederim. yapımcıya selamlar.

"The Home: Into The Woods" is a low key asset flip, a bunch of other people's assets assembled badly to make a basic game, typically this kind of thing is done by amateur developers without sufficient budget, talent and/or staff to do the job of game development professionally. It's then quickly rushed into Steam Direct. And, unsurprisingly, this never results in a product with any quality, interest, or value for gamers. This is your usual kind of asset flip, a few Unity assets thrown in a blender to make a basic first person horror adventure, but this one is notable because it's considerably worse than all the other asset flips. This really does feel like a pre-schooler was given access to design the maps, it's just endless copy + pastes of the same tree asset, plus a few bits here and there, like some kids drawing or something. To say this is "bad" is an understatement and an unfair slight on the word "bad". So, the game might look better than you'd expect from an amateur project, but this is because it's partially or completely made up of stock assets, "borrowed" from asset stores and free asset websites. Very little in this game is truly the creation of the "developer", it's just a bunch of rearranged assets. While there's no up front price for this asset flip, the other problem with asset flips is that when developers aren't capable of doing their job and creating high quality assets, it's also true they can't do any of the rest of the job of a game developer either. That's definitely true for "The Home: Into The Woods". The game is really simple and unambitious in terms of implementation, more of a tech demo or one of those cases where an amateur developer spends $100 to publish something on Steam Direct to see if it's possible. Yes, obviously it's possible. A proof of concept, tech demo, or something that's less than a little blip on the radar isn't offering anything truly valuable to gamers. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 2 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Given that this free title won't increase your game collector count, is it worth your time to add it to your library? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.