
Tactical Control: the 7-minute wargame. Simplified strategy with minimalist graphics and quick, intense games. Play short matches against random opponents. Fight tense battles of stealth, anticipation and surprise. Win with strategy, deception and cleverness, not with reflexes and clicking speed.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media
About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 44 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
Sadly, the multiplayer is dead.
This game seems pretty promising, it just lacks a playerbase. What it would need: - Normal gamemode vs. AI - maybe some more depth
Wouldve been fun if there were actually players and a single player mode
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Hours played at review time, across 44 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
it’s a demo. there’s nothing but the tutorial. It’s more like a school project than an actual game
7 dakikalık savaş oyunu. Minimalist grafikler ve hızlı, yoğun oyunlarla basitleştirilmiş strateji. Rastgele rakiplere karşı kısa maçlar oynayın. Gergin gizlilik, beklenti ve sürpriz savaşlarıyla savaşın. Reflekslerle ve tıklama hızıyla değil, stratejiyle, aldatmacayla ve zekayla kazanın.
this game is very fun, it's very simple and easy to understand , would recommend this to a friend
Tactical Control was an attempt at making a PvP only RTS with a twist... the developer didn't bother with unit balance, graphics, or any basic minimum quality aspect of modern video game development. You're presented with an ultra minimalist 2D grid with "units" on it, but the units are just squares with a letter to describe the type of unit and a number to show the health of the unit. The objective is to move your units and kill the other players units... there's no base building or any real elements of tactics or strategy. One common misconception about video games is that if they're bad in one area, they must be good in another, right? Like blind people are supposed to have better hearing? It's just not true. The opposite is true for games. Usually if the developer phones in the artwork, the rest of the game is terrible too. That's certainly the case with Tactical Control. In the tutorial, the only PvE part of the game, you fight very weak enemy units, which you outnumber with units that have way better stats. But 1:1, your unit will still lose against the AI. The developer screwed up even the core game mechanics! Units have zero autonomy, they won't even fire unless you force them to. There's zero AI in this game. The game isn't even truly free, the developers have their hand out for $3 USD to unlock all the features of this incomplete game. As a PvP only RTS, it failed. SteamDB shows the game peaked at just 14 concurrent players, which is a pitiful number, and that happened only once shortly after launch. and now the game has practically no players, with numbers around 2, and they seem to be bots. There's not enough players to form a match at any time, so the game is completely dead. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! The developers made the fatal, lazy mistake of believing that PvP, other players, would be an acceptable substitute for doing the difficult job of adding single player level design, storytelling, NPCs and other rich aspects of designed game content to the game. As a result of this choice by the developers, the game has little to no actual interactive game content. It's a little considered fact that the vast majority of PvP only, multiplayer only games [b]fail[/b]. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable subsititue for doing the job of game developers and building a game filled with content. PvP only games must have a [b]huge[/b] player base for them to "go viral" and succeed. But with no single player experience to add lasting value to a game, the developers instead chose to bet against all odds that their game would "go viral" without any actual reason for players to want to play the game. Predictably, they lost this bet. The terribly low quality and shoddy implementation of this game, combined with the zero-content policy and basic game features being paywalled was easily sufficient to deter gamers from even bothering with this mess. I'm going to side with the rest of the 120,000,000 gamers on Steam who never bothered to download this, and suggest you don't either. If you want a great RTS game on Steam, try C&C Remastered, Grey Goo or Homeworld. They're truly great games.
Мужики, спасайте, если наберём 10 лайков и 5 наград, то жена подарит ящик пива
Bien: -ça se dl en quelques secondes -c'est gratuit moins bien: - souvent difficile de trouver des parties (si ce n'est impossible) car personne ne joue au jeu --> recommandé de jouer avec des amis
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.