Sid Meier's Civilization VII

After a few playthroughs, this game just isn't grabbing me the way all other Civ games have, and I've been playing since Civ 2. I'm not a fan of the gameplay & progression, personally, although I understand why some might prefer the style. My biggest criticism of 7 is how busy the map gets. There's no room to breath, it just seems like the cities kind of run together, and there isn't any space between them. The maps just get.... busy. Nothing stands out, nothing seems epic. Civ 5 & 6 are my favorites, in that order. I'd recommend going back, if you still want to enjoy Civ.

This game just feels empty compared to previous civ games. The civics and research tree just blend one into another, and the lack of unit upgrades feels lazy. In Civ 6, you got swordsmen upgrade into longswordsmen after the researching of steel. Now its swordsmen, into... swordsmen (part 2). None of it feels either especially linked to either the technology or the civ. The switching of the civs is okay I guess, it kind or works. You can folllow a narrative - rome to norman france, to modern day french empire kind of holds as a civ history. But the resets, even if you want it to be continuous, mean that you lose your entire army and get it generically upgraded to relevant era units, regardless of whether you actually researched them in time of the previous era. And ERAs. Wow, what a ♥♥♥♥ show. No more can you build a science powerhouse and get through the eras quickly. NO more reseraching renaissance tech whilst someone has just entered the medieval period and earning an advantage. No, if you earn more science, and reserach everything, what do you get? The chance to do "further science" - something that was previously held for the end game of science when we went beyond the modern era. Nothing feels like it matters when you play, it all feels so damn arbitrary. And that's before you get to the city and town modelling. They've tried once again here to copy humankind's features and failed. IN humankind, you can link smaller towns to your major cities, only having a few cities and as many feeder towns as you want. That tracks. In Civ, you're capped on total settlements, regardless of type. SO other than the obvious cost and time penalties to build anything (becuase everything else is just based on gold purchases), why wouldn't you just have 10 cities and no towns? What is the point? I have played every Civ game since the first and I am a diehard fan of this franchise. Hundreds of hours on each game individually, and Civ 5 was one of my favourite strategy games ever. But this is just bland, desperate to be something it isn't, and trying to copy its competitors and failing instead of doing what civ does best, coming up with unique and new features (like the weather events or religions introduced a couple games back), that make you want to say one turn more.....

Вообще цива неплохая, но что не понравилось: -местами оказуаленная -способы победы непонятны -в отличие от 6 непонятно сколько у противника науки, культуры, золота за ход (этих данных просто как будто нет, догадывайся) -разработчик попытался её обрезать по времени, чтобы партии не шли несколько десятков часов, но по моему мнению они налажали -сложности очень бредовые, мне за 44 часа ни один бот не решил объявить войну даже на сложности государь (следующие сложности е ставил) -новая механика мол идёт война, жителям не нравится ваша власть и они снести половину строений и обрушили тем самым всю экономику вообще бред. Кто это придумал? -новая механика что можешь выбрать любого лидера и к нему любую нацию, и тут тоже налажали, так как играется это как то криво, в большинстве смешно -в каждой партии происходит чума и ты с этим ничего не можешь сделать, только смотреть как в городах погибают люди, и рядом стоящие юниты тоже -новая система общения и делегаций с лидерами -новая ленивая система с городами госудаствами, которые появляются на 1 эпоху а потом исчезают, в 5 где они были отдельными государствами которые ещё фиг захватишь было лучше, в 6 тоже неплохо, но они опять же чувствовались как марионетоные государства -иконки юнитов очень маленькие, постоянно путаешь где кто -новое дерево прокачки цивилизации, однотипное, ленивое, не особо меняющее прогресс в отличие от предыдущих частей -цена (просто необоснованно большая, за длс по 15000 тенге, это тупость в котором ешё пара лидеров и платные чудеса природы, не ну здесь просто слов нет, одни эмоции) -ачивок совсем чуть-чуть по сравнению с 5,6 частями Что понравилось -графика -частично интерфейс -новая механика с городами и районами (города выглядят просто шикарно) -как выглядят лидеры, в отличие от 6 части они больше на людей похожи, а не на карикатуры из мультика Как говорил Алексей Халецкий: "не цивилизация Сида Мейера"!

This game is honestly unplayable due to poor programming. Units constantly just walk the completely opposite direction where you you tell them to go. Embarrassing that this game is a year old and still this bad. It is obvious no one in leadership at Take Two knows anything about video games, short the stock into oblivion.

I've always been a Civ fan, every game has been an upgrade of the game before with better experience. However i can't say the same for Civ VII. Yes it has beter graphics ad cosmetics, the Commander battle system and the vertical city build is great, but the overall gameplay is weak and repetitious. Building wonders gives no great benefits, leaders buffs are not great, tech tree is too short. Its just too fair when the world isn't. Diplomatic option on Civ VI is limited, here its worse. Everytime you build a wonder, the reward animation is weak, lazy, and Gwendoine Christie's voice over is used at its minimum effort.

I've been playing Civilization since 1991. This is the worst of them all.

你文明7也算是糖完了，奠基者版变成了一个笑话，给的福利还不如文明6多；新dlc价格水涨船高，内容全凭脚填数值和复制粘贴；单机游戏内置反作弊系统也是业界一流，开了创意工坊之后直接让这东西成为笑谈，哦最招笑的是刚发售的时候UI依托答辩bug满天飞反倒是研制了个可笑的单机反作弊系统，完全本末倒置；pvp坏档问题一直到现在不优化让人在2026品尝2025刚发售时的风情。快跑吧孩子们