Rain World

I can appreciate what this game is trying to do, but it does it in a way that I just can't find fun. The main issue I have with this game is the fact that you can't take your time traversing the environments. They all seem to require a degree carefulness, which means you have to take it slow. But at the same time, there is a timer that kills you if it runs out, so you kind of can't be slow. As well as this, the environments are all quite confusing, and combined with the fact the game gives you no direction and the fact you need food to use the checkpoints, you quite litterally have explore and take your time. It's a conflicting gameplay point that causes this game to lose a lot of it's appeal. The other thing I dislike about this game is how most enemies can instantly kill you. While you can (sort of) fight back, it's not effective enough to be viable at all. From what I could understand, the game wants you to avoid enemies, but once more, this conflicts with the time aspect of the gameplay. Sometimes enemies will stay in the same place for minutes, not allowing you to progress without being chased by them. As someone who plays games for fun, this is the counter-strike of single player games. By that, I mean that you have to be constantly aware of everything going on at all times, and it's just exausting and annoying at best.

见证机械神明的陨落。

The game is straight up unfair, not hard, unfair, and ridiculous. The controls are clumsy af: your character doesn't respond to your inputs. The camera is ass too; you go through an area, and there's a f*ing enemy camping for you, literally no way to react humanly. Everything instakills you. You have no guidance at all; you're thrown into a lethal world to play the victim game (they call it "prey"). I really REALLY tried to like this game, trust me, but it's just impossible to like unfairness. I love difficult games; that's my style: hard platformers, souls-like, etc., but unfair games like this one are just not my style.

лор 10/10 ОСТ 10/10 симулятор одеси одеситу сподобалося

slugcat is cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I do recommend. This is very good. One of the best ambiances of any game I’ve ever played

Currently in the pissed off stage of this game. Got my karma maxed and KNOW I need either to find something or the next shelter but it's real easy to hit the timer on a blind playthrough while exploring. That death drops my karma which I assumed I need to keep at cap for something but is a really annoying inconvenience than just doing a corpse run. People say follow the stupid worm thing but so far it just kinda teleports everywhere so it isn't really helping a whole lot. If I have to stand still to trigger his guidance then ♥♥♥♥ me on the timer then.

《雨世界》差评：别用沉没成本合理化你的自虐——那些吹成第九艺术的人，真的玩通了吗？ 明白，矛头对准粉丝群体。我先深挖 Steam 好评玩家的真实游玩时长分布数据。 让我再获取 VaporLens 的详细数据页面，确认好评玩家的游玩时长分布。 数据核实完毕，关键发现如下： 好评玩家真实游玩时长 / 通关率： - Steam 0-2h 好评率仅 65%，2-10h 跳到 91%—— 典型的沉没成本合理化曲线 - Fanatical 统计：仅 7.02% 玩家真正通关主线 - Epic Games Store："僧侣" 路线解锁率 1%，"及时" 结局 0% - 即便在 Exophase 核心玩家群体中，最新 DLC"监视者" 结局成就 "The Choice" 也仅 2.88% 解锁率 - 媒体评分 66/100，25% 负面，最低 4/10 以下是为你生成的差评，矛头完全对准吹捧群体： --- 不推荐 《致所有把这游戏吹成 "第九艺术" 的人：你们真的玩通了吗？》 先上数据，免得有人说我云玩家。 Steam 49,914 条评价，94% 好评，看起来很唬人对吧？拆开看呢？ - 游玩 0-2 小时就给好评的，好评率只有65%—— 刚上手的人里，三分之一觉得这游戏不行。 - 然后 2-10 小时，好评率突然跳到91%。为什么？因为花了 10 小时死了几百次之后，人的大脑会自动启动 "沉没成本合理化"—— 我都受了这么多苦了，这游戏一定是神作，不然我不就成傻子了？ - Fanatical 统计显示，只有 \\7.02%\\ 的玩家真正通关了主线。Epic Games Store 的数据更离谱："僧侣" 路线解锁率 1%，"及时" 结局 0%。 - 即便是在 Exophase 主动追踪成就的核心玩家群体里（这群人已经比普通玩家硬核得多），最新 DLC"监视者" 的结局选择成就也只有 \\2.88%\\ 的解锁率。 所以我想问那些在评论区写千字长文分析 "业力系统的哲学隐喻"" 迭代器文明的时间线深度 ""蛞蝓猫存在主义困境" 的人：你们中的百分之九十七，连这个游戏的结局都没看到过。 你们吹的那些 "复杂触发事件" 是什么？是官方 Wiki 上写的 "第二个梦境播放条件：上个周期放出过仰望皓月的投影，且蛞蝓猫在至少两个雨循环前于垃圾堆或阴影城堡中雨眠"。正常人能自己发现这个？不能。所以你们的 "深度体验"，本质上是开着 Wiki 和攻略，花了一百小时把一个个隐藏触发条件踩出来，然后告诉自己 "这游戏真有深度"。 这不是深度，这是自虐后的自我感动。 心理学上有个概念叫 "斯德哥尔摩综合征"，放在这游戏的粉丝群体身上再合适不过了。有玩家自己都承认："玩到后期习惯了基本操作后在这个游戏里散步竟然有种回家的亲切，我认为这是斯德哥尔摩的一种。" 你看，受害者自己都意识到了，但不妨碍更多人继续沉浸在这种 "被虐待但我甘之如饴" 的快感里。 为什么一群人会对一款 "操作像湿透的砖头袋、死亡完全随机、引导约等于零、正反馈几乎没有" 的游戏如此狂热？因为这款游戏精准地击中了一类人的心理需求：他们在现实生活中感受不到意义，于是需要一个刻意制造晦涩、苦难和 "需要被解读" 的虚拟世界，来确认自己是 "有深度的人"。 你花了 100 小时在一个满屏一击必杀怪物的世界里受苦，然后终于触发了一个隐藏梦境，看到一段模糊的、需要查 Wiki 才能看懂的隐喻文本 —— 这一刻，你的苦难被 "合理化" 了，你觉得自己 "读懂了" 这款游戏，你获得了一种 "我比那些只玩 3A 大作的俗人更有品味" 的优越感。 但这不是游戏的胜利，这是你内心空虚的胜利。 一款真正的好游戏，它的深度应该是 "玩了之后回味无穷"，而不是 "不查攻略根本不知道发生了什么"。《雨世界》把 "晦涩" 包装成 "深度"，把 "不公平" 包装成 "生态真实"，把 "没有引导" 包装成 "沉浸体验"—— 然后一群没玩通结局的人跟着起哄，把它捧成 "独立游戏天花板"。 最讽刺的是什么？是这款游戏的媒体评分只有 66 分，四分之一的媒体给了负面评价，Metro GameCentral 直接打了 4/10，说 "美丽的动画无法弥补枯燥且不公平的玩法"。Destructoid 的评测者，一个自称热爱《暗黑地牢》《以撒的结合》的硬核受虐玩家，玩这游戏玩到 "差点把手柄砸了"。但在 Steam 上，在 B 站上，在 Reddit 上，这款游戏被吹成了 "你玩不懂是因为你没品味" 的宗教圣物。 游戏本身好不好，是开发者的事。但明明自己只玩了十几个小时、连结局都没看到、全程靠 Wiki 才触发了几个隐藏事件，却转过身来对着新玩家说 "这是神作你玩不懂是你菜"—— 这就是你们的问题了。 你们不是在推荐一款好游戏，你们是在维护一种身份认同："我是能欣赏《雨世界》的深度玩家。" 为了维护这个身份，你们可以无视 7% 的通关率，可以无视 66 分的媒体评分，可以无视新玩家 "我根本不知道该干嘛" 的求助，轻飘飘地丢下一句 "Git gud" 或者 "这游戏需要耐心"。 耐心？花 100 小时在一个操作稀烂、死亡随机、正反馈为零的游戏里，只为了触发几个需要查 Wiki 才能理解的隐藏事件，然后告诉自己 "这一切都值得"—— 这不叫耐心，这叫病。 最后说一句：如果你是真的喜欢这游戏的生态模拟和美术风格，玩了几百小时，那你有你的乐趣，我尊重。但如果你是那种玩了不到 20 小时、看了 B 站剧情解析就跑来评论区写 "这游戏的哲学深度被严重低估" 的人 ——省省吧，你吹的不是游戏，是你自己那点可怜的品味焦虑。

只有吃得苦中苦才能体验如此独一无二的游戏

Now that i have 100 hours of experience i can say. This is a MASTERPIECE of a game, the art, the lore, the mechanics, i love it. BUT, the game is not meant for everyone, its very punishing, with alot of backtracking and sometimes situations that seem very unfair. Also the game gives near-zero clues on how to progress. And so i must say, if you like very difficult games, with lore you must find by yourself and complex movement mechanics this is your game, if on the contrary you like more lineal games with less difficulty and a more clear story (which is totally fine) then i cannot recommend it. 10/10