Qorena

Qorena, saf, hayatta kalma ve aksiyonun yukarıdan aşağıya, mermi cehennemi, aksiyon-arena nişancı oyunudur! Kurşun yağmuru cehenneminin çok çeşitli çok oyunculu seviyeleri, savaşılacak çok sayıda canavar ve dünyayı kişiselleştirme yeteneği ile birlikte geliyor!

This is a fun game and will keep you busy for a long time.

Игра Qorena - это стремительный футуристический спорт, сочетающий элементы роллерного дерби и киберпанка. Визуально игра очень привлекательна: яркие арены, стильные персонажи и динамичные эффекты создают захватывающую атмосферу. Геймплей требователен к реакции и тактическому мышлению. Необходимо быстро перемещаться по арене, уклоняться от атак противника и использовать уникальные способности персонажей, чтобы доставить мяч в ворота. Qorena обладает высоким порогом вхождения, но освоение механик приносит массу удовольствия. Система прогресса позволяет постепенно открывать новых персонажей и улучшать их характеристики, что добавляет мотивации к игре. Музыкальное сопровождение идеально подходит под игровой процесс, создавая дополнительный драйв. Несмотря на свои достоинства, игра временами ощущается однообразной. Отсутствие более разнообразных режимов игры и карт может быстро наскучить. Также не хватает более глубокой кастомизации персонажей. В целом, Qorena - это интересная и динамичная игра с потенциалом, требующая дальнейшего развития и добавления контента.

[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] This laughably bad top down shooter might have been put on Steam as a joke (the graphics are that bad), but the presence of a "make your own MS-Paint avatar" features makes me afraid someone was serious about this as a contender on Steam. Enough to make you shudder. So, "Qorena" is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! [i]Most PvP games on Steam fail.[/i] Very few of them ever go viral. This game failed because the developer expected it to become "virally" popular without creating any actual reason or compelling features. This doesn't do anything that other games already do better. PvP games face extreme competition, PvP gamers have plenty to choose from and they gravitate to where all the other players are. This game didn't offer anything to peel those PvPers away from the PvP games they're already invested in. It had no upfront cost, but gamers still rejected it. This game lacks any meaningful solo content. The developer tried to use other players as a substitute for real work like level design and story, gambling that just because their game exists, it's going to magically pull the entire player base of Counter-Strike 2 over to this failure instead. They lost that unwise gamble. A game with no players and no solo content is a dead game. Developers need to stop relying on players as a substitute for real content, just because they feel creating genuine narrative, level design and so on is "too hard". In terms of visuals, this features really godawful MS-Paint tier "art" instead of real graphics. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks much worse than most other games because of that decision, and that's a major deterrent to gamers. The deplorably bad visuals here come across as an insult to gamers. You're forced to sign a highly questionable yet legally unenforceable End User License Agreement... for such a relatively low effort, low quality product, this comes across more as a delusion of grandeur than anything else. This agreement includes questionable requirements that may attempt to revoke consumer law protections that gamers expect to have, which is also highly problematic. Developers must learn they are here to serve gamers, not control them. I had my cat walk over the keyboard while the EULA was displaying, which fixed that problem for me. Next is pricing and what value this has for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $10 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. Even as a free game, this couldn't find an audience. With a peak of [b]only 11 players[/b], it's clear the Steam community took one look and walked away. They literally couldn't pay people to spend time playing this. All other issues aside (any of which would disqualify this from being worth your time), this is a game that relies on other players for it to be viable, and because there's not enough players, it's not viable. I can't recommend anyone downloads this, it's basically dead.

XeqtR GameSense

☀️

Обзор за 10 секунд https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Srren-Y5TqM