
In 2013 the world was devastated by an apocalyptic event, annihilating almost all mankind and turning the Earth's surface into a poisonous wasteland. A handful of survivors took refuge in the depths of the Moscow underground, and human civilization entered a new Dark Age. The year is 2033.
Most likely between $30.4M and $86.1M. How we estimate →
Checked against 8 developer-reported games
| Store | Price | Score | Revenue · chart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steam | $19.99 | 92% | approximately $50.6M |
| PlayStation | $19.99 | 88% | — |
| Xbox | $19.99 | 90% | — |
| GOG | $1.99 | 84% | #140 |
| Epic | $19.99 | 93% |
Cheapest copy: ≈ $1.18 on Xbox · Türkiye (−94%). Compare 43 prices in 15 markets →
Reviews
Themes across 3426 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
| — |
Matched by title. Prices and chart positions are each store's US storefront; Epic charts worldwide. * critic score.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
I kind feel bad for buying it SO cheap. It is immensely engaging and intriguing; a byproduct of PS3-era gameplay set on a soviet narrative that I've never experienced before. I will _very_ gladly play the rest of the franchise.
Only cause of the story. They dumbed down the original Metro 2033. Human enemies stand around and don't see you. A very poor shooter. If you can get a copy of the old Metro 2033, but than you have to change some files that it runs fluent with modern computers. This new version is far worse than the unforgiving atmospheric frightening stealth shooter. But the story is still the same and for COD players who want to have a game with a good story this version does it. But it is not the same game. In the old version there was extremely rare ammunition and filters and you depended very much on stealth and throwing knives/stealth weapons, or you had the complete enemy station in your neck which was very "unfunny", Each Level was a little puzzle how to solve it without getting into an unnecessary heavy firefight. THIS was the intended gameplay. Now think of a new version which is played as a shooter with much more ammunition and mask filters where human enemies behave like sheeps. And you get a feeling how the atmoshere changed in Redux..... For me it is boring and a very mediocre shooter even on ranger hardcore.
самое главное не ешь желтый снег!!!
ностальгия)
[i] "Каждый пожинает то, что посеял. Насилие порождает насилие, и за смерть платят смертью. Те, кто не испытывает сомнений и не знает раскаяния, никогда не вырвутся из этого круга." [/i] К сожалению, цитата Хана будет всегда актуальна.
Muy buen shooter <3
No soy de jugar historias así, pero dios mío... Es totalmente un clásico juegazo: diría sí, que su historia y construcción del mundo son su tema fuerte y que un punto débil sería su economía y que a veces -por mi manera de jugar- me perdía explorando para encontrar detalles y eso me sacaba de la tensión. Ya me pasé el juego 1 vez, solo en modo normal y creo que saque un final, no sé si hayan más o así. Tampoco he jugado ningún otro juego de la trilogía, pero si son apasionados por las historias distópicas, este juego es perfecto. PDT: Te extraño Borboun PDT2: Sí, corre en una patata.
I thought this would be like the last one that was more open world and it's not. It seems like it's just one battle scene after another and the plot isn't as well thought out. The fun part about the open world concept was that you had missions within the world and things you had to do and you could choose and go on side missions. You could also deviate from the mission and find entirely other areas of the map or cool buildings to hunt through that had nice weapons or upgrades. The weapon system on this seems really simple and you can't really mod your guns out that much. And there's no real use in changing weapons 'cause they're all kind of the same. It's very linear from one room to the next. and it's basically just a shooter where you watch long cutscenes in between every room where you shoot a bunch of stuff. Maybe I'm having the ordering wrong, but it doesn't seem as fun or as in-depth of a game as the first one, somehow. One last thing about the characters. None of your allies are interesting at all. The first one you had a team of people with you going through the different open worlds and And they would go from world to world on a train. So your whole crew went with you. And there was always a reason for you to fight for your crew and for the defense of the train, which also had your future wife on it. This one is just random people showing up and then acting like your best friend and then almost instantly dying. So there's no real reason to get interested in any of your allies or care about the plot line at all because It's literally just a bunch of random people. I don't know if they're even good guys or bad guys when you're hanging out with them or shooting around with them. Without a family arc, a love arc, or a romance arc, the plot really Is thin. Correction to some or all of this: This came out in 2014 and the one that I'm actually talking about that I liked came out in 2019. So the game just evolved. To something better later on. But that being said, all the things above are still true and it's Tedious and monotonous to play. I'd say skip this one and just go to the 2019 edition.
Это база, это знать нужно. Игра бодро играется даже на сегодняшний день (если не учитывать что больше 1600 на 1200 с включенным гсинком вы не увидите), слелс хромает, но игра имеет свою атмосферу, шарм, закрыл на платину за 2 прохождения, игра доставила огромное удовольствие.
Игра полностью пропитана антисоветчиной. Как всегда в целом в подобных играх