GHOSTWINTER

В целом графика нравится стрельба необычная, но хорошая! автору респекту, но как-то есть минусы небольшие! https://youtu.be/0Ppc2xylcDM фулл обзор 1) думаю конечно удобнее на цифру оружие менять или колесиком, а не выбрасывать) 2) Мультиплеер не играл, поэтому оценку пока сказать не могу 3) Ненавижу игры, где в итоге надо искать последних врагов, нашёл 18 из 20... а дальше 2 врагов больше часа искал и толку 0..

[quote][b][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_flip]Warning: Asset Flip![/url][/b] "GHOSTWINTER" is one of literally thousands of creatively bankrupt asset flips infesting Steam and lowering the average quality of all video games everywhere.[/quote] This poorly made Unity Asset Store kitbash is an incredibly lazy mess... wander around a bunch of Unity asset backdrops with an asset flipped gun on a first person shooter game template, and shoot a variety of Unity Asset Store dinosaur assets and things. There's no fake reviews on this one, but the "developer" was charging money for this, trying to get YOUR money for someone else's Unity assets. This is never okay. So, "GHOSTWINTER" is partially or completely made up of stock assets, "borrowed" from asset stores and free asset websites. Little, if anything in this game is the creation of the "developer". While there's no up front price for this asset flip, the other problem with asset flips is that when developers aren't capable of doing their job and creating high quality assets, it's also true they can't do any of the rest of the job of a game developer either. That's definitely true for "GHOSTWINTER", and this kind of asset flipping never results in games that have quality or value for PC gamers. This game is fairly dated at 5 years old... and even back then it looked old and busted compared to contemporary, professionally made 3D games of the same period. It looked bad then, it looks worse now. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $4 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 10 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? What's the verdict? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.