地府行记

不是哥么 你们真的做了关卡引导吗 不把李思妍微信告诉我我很难原谅啊

Bu oyunda, kayıp karısını bulmak için öbür dünyanın gizemli dünyasında dolaşan Taocu bir rahip rolünü üstleneceksiniz. Yedi farklı diyarı keşfediyor, çeşitli canavarlarla savaşıyor, eşyalar topluyor, yeni büyülerin kilidini açıyor, tüm olayın ardındaki gerçeği ortaya çıkarıyorlar.

"地府行记" is one of literally thousands of retro 2D platformers infesting Steam and lowering the average quality of all video games everywhere... and I'm not kidding. Searching for "platformers" on the Steam store page yields over 17,000 results! Is this one of the best of those? Absolutely not. This is a poorly done and unengaging platformer about a Taoist monk and his missing wife, so I guess he wasn't very good at being a monk. He's also not good at being in a platformer, this is a really poor experience even compared to other platformers on Steam. Like, do developers look at Steam at all when they're making a game? "I want to make a platformer, let's see, Hollow Knight, very successful, so I'll make something much much much worse than that and publish it, and it will surely be a success". See below for the peak player count. Platforming is an old, mostly dead genre, and this lacklustre experience, while it doesn't have an upfront cost, isn't saving the genre... it's no surprise this failed to capture any attention from gamers in the era of immersive 3D gaming. There's no English translation for the game, but that's okay. The language of bad games is universal. The graphics here are particularly awful, really weak papercraft looking "Southpark" esque sprites and backdrops that... yeah... they stole the backdrops from someone's Geocities home page, so bad that it actually stands out as one of the worst looking games on Steam. Quite an accomplishment. It's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 2 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Since free games don't contribute to your game collector badge and other profile stuff, is this a worthwhile addition to your Steam library? This is a "nope". While it won't necessarily cost you money, the time and hard drive space it requires could be better invested in one of the many higher-quality alternatives on Steam.