Anno 117: Pax Romana

Décevant. J'avais adoré Anno 1800 et j'avais adoré l'idée d'un Anno Rome, pour qu'au final ce ne soit rien de plus qu'un reskin. La campagne se finit abruptement, on sent qu'un Acte III travaillé aurait dû clôturer l'aventure mais rien. L'esclavage est totalement absent du jeu (à part le conseiller mdr), l'armée est si rudimentaire qu'on peut tout aussi bien jouer sans, moins de personnalisation, moins de quêtes, d'interactions avec le peuple, etc. Franchement dommage

I think its pretty fun. I haven't had a chance to really delve deep into 1800 which I hear is the gold standard, but so far enjoying 117.

Other than the Ubi servers it is fun, especially when 200% of your workforce disappears in 5 seconds.

addictive city building with late game warfare that's epic to manage when playing coop multiplayer

I was cautious at first, because some AAA don't even work properly these days. Yet, this game is historical accurate, runs perfectly on a low-end machine, has depth, but still is accessible to me as an average player.

I’m really enjoying Anno 117: Pax Romana. The gameplay is immersive, the city-building is rewarding, and the graphics are absolutely spectacular. The environments, buildings, and small details make the Roman world feel alive. It’s a beautiful, engaging game that keeps pulling me back in.

Not a man of many words. Enjoy the game a lot, follows much in what Anno 1800 set as standards. In some ways more, in some ways less complex. After almost a year a good amount of bugs after release has been fixed (or all? I certainly don't encounter them anymore). DLC model is the same as with 1800, big dlcs are included in the season pass, smaller cosmetic ones are not. I don't see how some people expected this to be different now. I'll give it an 8/10. It's a great Anno, the setting plays well, the game looks as beautiful as could be expected after the successor. Recommended!