
A graphic adventure set 200 years in the future in the flooded city of Worcester. Who were the humans? Why did they have to leave? Where are they now? Guide a swan and a duck as they attempt to find out.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Reviews
really beautiful game. the animal illustrations are lovley!
"The Severn Rising 2222" is a community art piece from the UK that plays out a bit like an episode of the documentary "Life After People" (it's a good documentary if you get a chance to watch it). People are gone 200 years in the future and you go on a narrative art experience with a swan and a duck. What do you do in the game? You explore locations, talk to characters, and solve inventory puzzles in a classic point-and-click adventure style, but all of this is done badly, movement is sluggish.. this is bad even as a browser game, but now it's on Steam trying to compete with PC games... no chance. So, it's hard to describe this as a game, the focus of the product is more like that of an "art experience", there's only minor, shallow and uninteresting gameplay elements. Yes, games can be art, art is where the pinnacle of imagination and narrative meet the apex of craftsmanship... this has neither good creativity or craftsmanship. The Mona Lisa wouldn't be hanging in the Louvre if she was drawn in crayon on the back of a coaster. This is a browser game... it doesn't matter if this was ported to PC before or after the website publication. This is built for the absolutely lowest of all gaming platforms and must be judged as such... it's not going to give you a cutting edge PC gaming experience. That alone is enough to disqualify this from any recommendation. We don't spend thousands building gaming rigs so that we can use Steam to try compete with Chrome and Firefox. Visually, this features mediocre hand drawn style "Baby's First Wacom Tablet" art instead of contemporary graphics. This obviously looks better than pixelcrap, but that's a really low bar to barely stumble over. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating rich 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks worse than a professionally made game would look, and that's a major deterrent. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 2 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Given that this free title won't increase your game collector count, is it worth your time to add it to your library? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough. The "art experience" is up on the web if you really need to engage with this for whatever reason, and that would save you the effort of downloading it here on Steam.
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
☀️