
From the lead designer of Cold Waters, Sea Power lets you control NATO and Warsaw Pact forces in modern naval conflict campaigns. Use your advanced naval weaponry and sensors to respect rules of engagement and defeat the enemy forces in a tense fight for initiative and air/naval supremacy.
Most likely between $7.9M and $22.3M. How we estimate →
Checked against 8 developer-reported games
Cheapest copy: ≈ $18.97 on Steam · Russia (−62%). Compare 15 prices in 15 markets →
Reviews
Themes across 1250 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
---{ Grafik }--- ☐ Du vergisst die Realität ☐ Umwerfend ☑ Gut ☐ Ganz ok ☐ Schlecht ☐ Längeres Betrachten kann unerwünschte Nebeneffekte haben ☐ MS-DOS ---{ Gameplay }--- ☐ Sehr gut ☑ Gut ☐ Normales Gampelay halt ☐ Mehh ☐ Farbe beim trocken zuzuschauen ist spannender ☐ Lass es einfach ---{ Audio }--- ☐ Ohrgasmus ☐ Sehr gut ☑ Gut ☐ So lala ☐ Schlecht ☐ Mein HNO hat mir Höhrgeräte verschrieben ---{ Zielgruppe }--- ☐ Kinder ☐ Jugendliche ☑ Erwachsene ☐ Omi & Opa ---{ Systemanforderungen }--- ☐ Funktioniert MS Paint? ☐ Kartoffel ☑ Durchschnittlicher PC ☐ High-End ☐ Hast du reiche Eltern? ☐ Frag NASA, ob sie einen Supercomputer für dich herumliegen haben ---{ Spiel Größe }--- ☐ Floppy Disk ☐ Alte Größe ☑ Okay ☐ Groß ☐ Wird 15% deiner 1 TB Festplatte brauchen ☐ Du brauchst eine dedizierte Festplatte für das Spiel ☐ Du wirst wohl oder übel in ein scharzes Loch investieren müssen um das Spiel zu speichern ---{ Schwerigkeit }--- ☐ Einfach nur 'W' drücken ☐ Leicht ☑ Leicht zu Lernen, schwer zu meistern ☐ Benötigt einiges an Hirnschmalz ☐ Schwer ☐ Dark Souls 2.0 ---{ Story }--- ☑ Keine Story ☐ Bissi ☐ Joa ☐ Gut ☐ Recht gut ☐ Das Spiel wird dein Leben ersetzen ---{ Spielzeit }--- ☐ Lang genug für eine Tasse Tee ☐ Kurz ☐ Normal ☑ Lang ☐ Bis zum Hitzetod des Universums und noch viel länger ---{ Preis }--- ☐ Praktisch geschenkt ☑ Es lohnt sich ☐ Nur mit Rabatt ☐ Wenn du ein bisschen Geld übrig hast ☐ Nicht empfohlen ☐ Benutz das Geld lieber zum einheizen ---{ Bugs }--- ☐ Keine mitbekommen ☑ Ein paar ☐ Kann nervig werden ☐ ARK: Survival Evolved ☐ Das ganze Spiel ist ein einziges Bugfest ---{ ? / 10 }--- ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☑ 8 ☐ 9 ☐ 10 ---{ Urheber }--- ☑ https://vojtastruhar.github.io/steam-review-template
哎,比勾八窝窝屎有意思
披着硬核外衣的意识形态宣传品,Triassic请停止夹带私货! 先说结论:不推荐。 如果你想玩的是冷战海战模拟,这游戏底子还行;但如果你想玩的是一个公平、客观的游戏——快跑。 槽点主要有三: 一、选择性失明的“历史模拟” 游戏标榜自己是冷战海空战术模拟,但制作组Triassic对阵营的刻画充满了双标。北约装备数据“合理”甚至美化,华约装备则各种“幽默”阉割。说好的“基于可信公开数据”呢?原来“可信”的标准是看合不合你们的口味?这种夹带私货的“模拟”,本质就是披着硬核外衣的意识形态输出。 二、扼杀社区,打压多元声音 更离谱的是对MOD社群的态度——扼杀和禁止。这游戏本体内容匮乏,全靠社区MOD撑着。中国玩家费心费力做中国海军MOD,你们非但不支持,反而各种设限。怎么,怕玩家做出太强的中国装备,戳破你们“游戏强国”的幻梦? 三、搞双标就别怪玩家不买账 我花钱是来玩游戏,不是来上课的。制作组有立场可以理解,但请光明正大写在商店页面上,别打着“硬核模拟”的旗号搞意识形态渗透。把政治私货包装成“历史真实性”,把不同声音打压成“不专业”——这一套,玩家看得太清楚了。 游戏可以偏颇,但玩家不瞎。差评奉上,好自为之。 --- English Version: Title: A Propaganda Piece Disguised as a "Hardcore Sim" — Triassic, Stop Pushing Your Agenda! Bottom line: NOT RECOMMENDED. If you want a Cold War naval sim, the foundation is decent. But if you want a fair and objective game — run. Three major issues: 1. Selective "Historical Simulation" The game claims to be a Cold War tactical-strategy sim, but Triassic's portrayal of the two blocs is blatantly double-standard. NATO equipment gets "reasonable" or even buffed stats, while Warsaw Pact gear gets ridiculed and nerfed. You claim to rely on "published data from trusted sources" — guess "trusted" just means whatever fits your narrative? This isn't simulation, it's propaganda dressed up as "hardcore." 2. Crushing the Mod Community, Silencing Diverse Voices Even worse is your treatment of the mod community — suppression and bans. The base game is content-starved and survives on community mods. Chinese players put in the effort to add PLAN content, and instead of support, you throw up barriers. Afraid that players might make China too strong and shatter your "game superpower" fantasy? 3. If You're Going to Play Favorites, Don't Expect Us to Pay for It I paid for a game, not a lecture. You're entitled to your bias — but be upfront about it on the store page. Don't hide your political agenda behind the label of "hardcore simulation." Don't gaslight players into thinking your bias is "historical accuracy" and dissent is "unprofessional." We see right through it. Games can be biased. But players aren't blind. Negative review. Do better.
응기잇 키로프 중순양함의 거대한 몸체...하푼으로 물들여버렷!!!
WHERE'S THE ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ SUBMARINE?! ARE THEY EVEN REAL? AM I JUST SHOOTING TORPEDOES AT SOME KIND OF WHALE? THERE ARE SONOBUOY'S EVERY 2 MILES ON THE DATUM AND THIS VICTOR 3 IS STILL YET TO BE SEEN. in all seriousness, i love this game, AI needs some work, especially aircraft, otherwise this is great.
i love this game so much 10/10
0/10 i cant have sex with the kirov class cruizer :c
Game is really good but the AI is so incredible stupid its insane its so bad that complex missions are not playable because units do not follow commands.
Interface is buggy and poorly designed. Feels VERY early access. Developers do not seem responsive to community. Example: People complaining about individual ship rudder position not being visible in controls for years. Still nothing. Just a minor thing in a huge list of minor things. Make in $20, and ok ... But asking close to full price for something like this is crazy.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah, I love there is no micromanagement, and love to see the things go boom and just enable weapons free! :D