Scrash

오직 컨트롤러만 지원합니다. 키보드랑 마우스 지원X 공을 팅겨내면서 방해물을 제거하고, 방해물 뒤편에 있는 타일과 충돌시키면 점수를 얻는 게임 아쉬운 점 -키보드+마우스 지원 X(PC게임인데...?) -혼자서 못함

trop des barre entre pote bon jeux

i can not go left or right with my controller i can only go up and dow how can i Fix this?

♥♥♥♥♥

[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] This is described by the developer as "Pong on crack" and this is both true, and absolutely not the flex the developer thinks it is... this is awful. Game development should not be done on drugs, the result is games like "Scrash". This is a weak hybrid of Pong and air hockey, which is awesome because if you get sober and think about it, Pong was already more like air hockey than table tennis, so that's a huge achievement from the developer right there. In fairness there's other gimmicks like different table layouts and destructive elements, which is all pointless because there's no players and no proper online/matchmaking. Epic failure, so it's easy to see why the developer abandoned this. So, "Scrash" is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. First and foremost, there's no meaningful single player content. The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the Game. They lost that bet. Without a huge community of players or single player content to add a lasting value to the game, the game dies. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for adding content to a game. The developers abandoned this 7 years and 6 months ago. It will never be completed. This unfinished game is just polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuinely, completely made games. The graphics here are particularly awful, minimalist neon garbage, so bad that it actually stands out as one of the worst looking games on Steam. Quite an accomplishment. It's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. This game is fairly dated at 7 years old... and even back then it looked old and busted compared to contemporary, professionally made 3D games of the same period. It looked bad then, it looks worse now. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. All other issues aside (any of which would disqualify this from being worth your time), this is a game that relies on other players for it to be viable, and because there's not enough players, it's not viable. I can't recommend anyone downloads this, it's basically dead.

1337