Pax Autocratica

è un misto tra esplorazione spaziale costruzione di base e fps troppe cose io preferisco solo fps

A pretty fun and interesting combination of elements from games like Mount and Blade, Palword, and Helldivers. However, combat leaves a lot to be desired. AI isn't so good, guns don't feel really punchy, audio issues during combat, enemies are easy to cheese because of the AI pathing. The base building aspect of this game is more akin to an RTS but it is very satisfying. For an early access on sale, it's not bad. I am interested to see how this game develops with time.

Lets just be honest here. IT IS EARLY ACESS, there is a lot of content in some places, less in others and quite a few bugs, but it is a unique experience that not many games have and it reminds me of lil abandoned game you my friend never heard of. "Genesis alpha one". The roguelite element is done very well, maps and missions tend to be slightly repetitive ngl, but weapons are unique and upgrades are not "+5%dmg" and more like "WELL DONE SOLDIER YOUR GRANADE LAUNCHER IS NOW A BIG FAT RAILGUN". Many devs don't get how important it is so i applaud that. I want to play more and am excited for what the team can do for the state. FOR THE FATHER!

还蛮好玩的，未来可期

I only played for about half an hour, but I've seen so many telltale signs of generative AI used in the art (and maybe the voice acting?) that I've been forced to write a review. If it was only used for concepting, if it was just placeholder art, whatever. I can't be bothered to engage with it when the primary loading screen of the game looks like an AI generated image that was touched up in photoshop by someone who thought they could fool us with a dash of human touch--which, spoiler alert, they didn't. That's not to mention the character portraits, which also bear the clear hallmarks of "ai misunderstanding human anatomy and its symmetries." I don't really want to give money to a company incapable of caring enough about their project to put quality human labor into *every aspect* of it before dumping it into my lap and saying "this is worth paying for," ESPECIALLY when they don't make use of Steam's generative AI disclosure (which they used to have, but for some reason got rid of, despite still containing AI generated content). What's the real problem with using AI to create parts of their game? Why not let this self-proclaimed small dev team (which they remind you of each time you launch the game) cut some corners while they're in early access so that they can create more while doing less? Because it's derivative. Because whatever concept they end up with, it has to be something so average, so banal, so mind-numbingly mediocre that it could be generated by a chatbot in less than a tenth of a second. I will be refunding this. Best of luck to the developers, I hope you choose to show some basic respect to your audience by being honest with them.

after the update(8/25/2026) windows security blocked the game. will change when it works again.

其实我个人感觉游戏性还不错，潜力还是很大的，点不推荐纯粹是因为好像只有不推荐才会被开发者看到。。。游戏的潜力绝对是大的，玩法什么的还是有的拓展的，但问题确实也不少，比如枪械的手感稀烂，当成fps玩的话会打的很难受；模型不太行，看着像十年前的建模；目前的玩法较为单调，感觉目前放出来的玩法也就是大部分游戏内部测试时的水准，其中感觉最要命的就是模型了，说真的作为一款新游戏，感觉质感还不如十年前的骑砍战团。。。

This games performance is pretty bad don't get me wrong it's fun but I'll keep my eye on it for like 8 months see what happens. Early access or not wouldn't recommend right now.