Limberjack

这个利用VR游戏的营销案子绝对是你想不到的 http://www.heix.cn/special/a2262.html 联动这种方式虽然不是什么新鲜事物，但是由于虚拟现实特有的沉浸感，能够大大地拓宽其适用范围。尽管虚拟现实的技术还处于发展阶段，并不能完美的模拟真实，但是这却为未来虚拟现实的发展提出了一个新的方向，相信目前无法做到的感受还原会随着技术的发展巧妙地解决。 更多精彩的评测请关注黑匣网heix.cn

"Limberjack" is a simple, badly made VR tech demo, basically "limbing" or using a chainsaw to cut the limbs off felled trees, so we're really trying to use badly made games to send messages that are harmful to the environment now? Anyway this is extremely shallow and limited. It's just a tech demo, not really a full, complete game with any notable value. This has some really mediocre looking graphics that will understandably be a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarly visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. You deserve better than compromises. It's VR exclusive, and that shows the developer failed to understand the most basic axiom of VR game design... if the only cool thing about your product is VR support, your product is not cool. You're forced to sign a highly questionable yet legally unenforceable End User License Agreement... for such a relatively low effort, low quality product, this comes across more as a delusion of grandeur than anything else. This agreement includes questionable requirements that may attempt to revoke consumer law protections that gamers expect to have, which is also highly problematic. Developers must learn they are here to serve gamers, not control them. I had my cat walk over the keyboard while the EULA was displaying, which fixed that problem for me. Not every "free" game really is. There's often MTX, or content locked behind DLC, or donations being requested, or any other number of things that could mislead gamers, but in this case I'm glad to say this really does appear to be a fully free game. Nothing demonstrates a developers belief in themselves and their work than giving it away without any remuneration. This is a service to themselves, and the gaming industry, and should be applauded. Of course, just because something is free, doesn't necessarily mean it's valuable. Even though this is "free", it failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 8 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.