Light Bearers 2

le premier était déjà excellent celui si améliore encore la formule. ce jeux mérite tellement plus de visibilité, du pur fun sans prise de tête. le free to play donne 75 a 80% de ce que le jeux dispose, et une seule personne a besoin d avoir le dlc pour faire profité tout le lobby

Took everything from the first game and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ruined it.

[quote][b]Note: Advert for a dead PvP game[/b] The game this is advertising contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. If you unlock the game through DLC purchases, it cannot be played as intended.[/quote] "Light Bearers 2" is is [b]not a complete game[/b]. It's an advertisement disguised as a full game when it isn't. You're expected to pay even more money through DLC just to unlock the actual content... yeah.. it's paywalled, NOT free. This is a shady way to market a for-profit product, and misleading gamers for profit is wrong. [i]Light Bearers 2[/i] is a dead PvP ripoff of Dead by Daylight but with "Light Bears" or "Light Bearers" (the developers don't seem sure) that have to survive long enough against the "Shadow" player... terrible idea and you have just as many problems surviving against the hideously bad graphics in that $13 cash grab... but you only get the full experience if you pay cash for DLC that removes the paywall. The goal here is to get you to spend [b]$13 USD[/b] on DLC to actually get the game. I do not recommend you give into those kinds of shady, deliberately misleading marketing practices. They're harmful to everyone. Let's look at the price and what kind of value this actually offers gamers. As an advertisement, this is only free in the same way that adverts on Youtube and banner ads in your browser are. This is a game demo that's been dumped on Steam to advertise another Steam store page in the hopes of raking in some cash. Just because advertisements are free, doesn't mean they're worth your time. It's important to understand there's a formal process to create a demo/page for a game which hasn't been followed here: https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/application/demos While it might seem like an innocuous mistake, publishing demos and advertisements as if they are full games is misleading and in some ways harmful. This advertisement is taking up marketing space and visibility that would be better made available to a developer that's done the right thing and created a full game. Instead, that visibility is given over to a demo/advert that's been published incorrectly and is polluting the marketplace. It's unclear if this mistake was made through incompetence or a deliberate intent to mislead gamers. Often developers may choose to incorrectly publish demo/advertisements as separate games as a cheap way to bypass paying Valve for marketing presence on the Steam front page, which may seem clever to them, but it's harmful behaviour and it's not good for gamers. Despite being a "free" game, this couldn't break triple figures, according to the player counts we can see on SteamDB, it's just in the double digits, and now it's not even getting those kinds of numbers. There's over 130 million gamers on Steam... this failed to appeal to almost all of them, most likely because of some or all of the reasons I supply in this review. Advertisements and incorrectly published demos don't add +1 to your game collector count, they aren't full games. It's impossible for me to recommend this incorrectly published advertising spam to gamers, you deserve better than adverts. [quote][url=https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/reviews]Developer Response![/url][/quote]The developer has weighed in to inform everyone they didn't read the [url=https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/reviews]Developer Usage Rules[/url] for Steam "partners", or they deliberately ignored the part where Valve says: [quote]Though it may be tempting, not every review needs to be responded to. A developer response will frequently draw more attention than the original statement, potentially turning a small issue into a much larger community discussion. It's also not a good idea to use this feature to refute customer opinions. Your direct attention can be seen as validation or a defensive attempt to silence your customers.[/quote] The developer response here is nothing short of a disgusting insult to gamers everywhere. Let's break down this toxic word salad of hostility and lies. The developer ADMITS that this is a for profit venture, and is NOT FREE. This is a tacit admission they did the wrong thing, on purpose, for money, to the detriment of gamers and ethical developers. Sure, some (not all) games are for profit... and there's ethical ways to go about making money, and there's shady, dishonest lies and malpractice. The developer defends his deliberate abuse and attempts to mislead gamers with one simple excuse: "Valve haven't banned me for the toxic crap and attempts to scam gamers, therefore it's ok to inflict my for profit cancer on Steam." What a disgusting attitude to take... and it's right there in black and white for all to see. The developer then comically claims victory and success because nobody touched this cancerous attempt to scam gamers into publishing a paid product as if it was free when it's not... what utter BS. Success is never a dead game with no players. What on earth was the developer smoking? The developer sheer toxicity and direct admission of unethical and harmful attempts to scam gamers explains so much about why this failed. But it excuses none of it. Nothing in the developers pointless breach of Valve guidelines changes any of the objective facts of my review. My review stands unaltered. I cannot recommend this scam to anyone.

plz have jynxzi play this game

disapointed in how the game got worse from light bearers 1

Динамичная чем 1 часть