iFactor

[h1]iFactor[/h1] Acho que nada de errado com o jogo em si até pq ele é gratuito e não tem muito o que reclamar nesse aspecto, mas só não acho que seria um jogo interessante pra chamar um amigo seu para jogar, a menos que vcs gostem muito de jogo nichado assim.

vai chamando um amigo seu para jogar com você e seguir o guia , ou se você não quiser jogar com um amigo é você terá que ter 2 windows =D , jogo chatinho para completar =@

iFactor is a competitive 2 player PvP maths game with a somewhat complex gameplay loop. Spiritually this is not so different from Othello meets Connect 4, but with a grid of numbers as the playing field, and a set of factors as your implements. Select two factors and the product they make when multiplied becomes yours. The goal is to take ownership of 4-in-a-row of products by carefully selecting the right factors. But beware, your opponent also chooses from the same factors and can "flip" your numbers. It's certainly a novel idea for a game and you can see there's some appeal in the depth of the gameplay... but on the other hand, this is Steam, for PC games. iFactor seems more like a mobile app, with text-only minimalist presentation that comes across as being lightweight for even a browser game or a mobile app. SteamDB shows the player count is practically zero, and there's no single player content, rendering this a dead game. Originally this seems to have been a paid game on Steam but this changed to a free model... and even still, nobody is playing. I feel this would perhaps have been more successful on mobile phones competing with games like Words With Friends, rather than trying to get PC gamers to stop playing Apex Legends or DOTA2 for this.

[h1]Disclaimer[/h1] This game review is only for the informational purposes only, and reflect my thoughts and ideas about it. If any comments here hurts your feelings, it was completely unintentional until explicitly mentioned. Your inferences do not imply my thoughts. [hr][/hr] [h1]Ratings[/h1] [b]Story[/b] - [i]N/A[/i] [b]Gameplay[/b] - 0% [b]Audio-Visual[/b] - 60% [b]Performance[/b] - 100% [i][b]Overall[/b] - Not recommended (32%)[/i] [hr][/hr] [h1]Description[/h1] [b]STORY (NO SCORING)[/b] There is no story associated with the game. It is a simple point-and-click game in which the users select the numbers from 1 to 9 in the set of two rows. Nothing more. [b]GAMEPLAY AND USER INTERACTIONS (SCORE – 0%)[/b] The game has totally NO AI, hence, the single player mode is reduced to a player playing on be-half of two users alone. Even the introverts don’t like anything like that (I am SME on that). The closest the game comes to being interactive is the game being played by two people on a same device. Also, the user interaction is based to point-and-click operations on the two rows of numbers filled with numbers from 1 to 9, and you can’t change that. The game claims to be multi-player using an online mode, though I can enter a game (or room), but there is no one to play against. I haven’t tried connecting to a specific room yet, so I am not rating that as of now. [b]AUDIO AND VISUAL QUALITY (SCORE – 60%)[/b] You can’t alter the audio of the game, not that I want to. You can change the video configuration at the start of the game, but no changes are allowed going further ahead, a feature shared by most games developed using Unity engine. [b]PERFORMANCE (SCORE – 100%)[/b] The game is quite light; I didn’t notice any loss of performance or lag in my system even after using the best visual settings. [b]FINAL VERDICT (SCORE – 32%; NOT RECOMMENDED)[/b] Despite being considered a geek, the game has been a major turn off for me. Lack of AI and the inept ability to play the game online aren’t helping the game at all. I would not recommend it, but if you are feeling like [b]Sadness[/b] from the animated movie [b][i]Inside Out[/i][/b] give it a try; it might suit you. [hr][/hr] [h1]Recommendations[/h1] The developers should be working on the AI engine of the game. It would also do it some good to work on the online mode of the game – connecting to room is never enough.

I don't like math.

gamesense