I was here

It feels like a cheap Russian Unity game. There is something there to make it interesting but it never gets there. Yes, I want to learn about citits and identify them using facts and pictures. But it just does not work in the game. Also there are game mode which do not make sense. And if you are not up on your knowledge of former USSR states you will be googling a lot. That is the reason why I call it Russian. Also there is a focus on those cities. Furthermore the English reads like Russian translated to English using Google translate. Score: 4/9

Дебилизм полнейший, покупать строго по скидки и для фарма карт

what is the city of Easy level 10 of Europ? I was stuck in here.

I thought I was fairly good at geography until I couldn't get past a single level on EASY mode without googling. I gave up after level 5 as it just wasn't enjoyable. Controls were frustrating as well. Trying to get rid of the journal to go back to take an obviously wrong guess was rage quit level of annoying. The achievements also give away the city names used in the game. Why wouldn't they make them hidden? Or not have an achievement for every.single. level and instead just have an overall easy mode completed etc. achievement. Would not recommend.

[quote][b][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_flip]Warning: Asset Flip![/url][/b] "I was here" is a Digital Homicide style asset flip, or what Valve calls a "Fake Game". The "developer" paid for/pirated a few online game assets and stock images, dumped them all in a blender, and submitted it to Valve as if they're real game developers.[/quote] It's a crappy quiz game where you look at one of the photos the developer stole off the internet and guess what country it is. It would be more fun trying to guess which image hosting site the developer stole it from. You get two choices for which sets of photos you want to look at. Europe, or, guess which country... yeah, Russia. Two notable criteria for what makes an asset flip instead of legitimate use of stock assets are whether those assets comprise the majority of the game, and whether the "developer" properly credited the people who created most of the assets in the game. This game fails both of those tests. The "developers" here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets here, so this is plagiarism, as well as cash grab shovelware. In this case, the asset flipper stole a bunch of stock landscape photos from the internet and is trying to get YOUR money for someone else's intellectual property by shoving those stolen pictures into a very basic quiz game template... that the developer ripped off from a Unity tutorial/template/demo pack. It has no value or merit as a real game. Taking this shovelware seriously as if it was a genuine attempt to make a game, it doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks. There's no way to ensure this is running at the native resolution of your display. There's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. The controls can't be customised because the game has such a dumbed down, simplified interface that it's just point and click stuff like a browser/Flash game. The fact that the interface is this dumbed down might be seen as a problem in itself, however... this is a fairly shallow experience if you're the kind of gamer that likes to play games with deep, rich control schemes and interaction. You'll get none of that here. For gameplay purposes, because the user interface for this game is mostly just 2D static text/images... it might as well be a web page. It's functionally no different from a browser game. And we all know, Steam isn't here to compete with Chrome and Firefox. If the game can be done in a web browser, it's just not rich or compelling enough to appeal to serious gamers on PC. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. The poor quality of this game is reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the all-time peak player number was only 5 players. This is a remarkably low number, and now, the only player activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 120 million gamers on Steam and well over 110,000 games for gamers to choose from, the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality game is to be expected. This kind of asset flipping isn't harmless. It makes it harder for gamers to find genuinely made games from ethical developers. It makes it harder for genuine indie developers, who put hard work into trying to make real games, to find an audience for their products. It gives indie developers a bad name. So, should you buy this asset flip? Is this better than any of the 110,000+ genuinely made games on Steam? Of course not! "I was here" has the gamer gouging price of around $6 USD, it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the sheer number of completely free, much higher quality games on Steam. For comparison, the $6 asking price for this game could get you games like "Dishonored 2", "Pillars of Eternity II" or "Grand Theft Auto V". Quality, professionally made games like those are frequently on sale cheaper than this.

Un gioco senza dubbio interessante, divertente da giocare con gli amici e per scoprire curiosità interessanti sulle città in giro per l'Europa. Al prezzo a cui è venduto, non posso che consigliarlo.

Gra edukacyjna – hm.. troszkę tak.. aczkolwiek najbardziej cieszy naprawdę dobrymi fotografiami.. Plusy : [list] [*]Prostota [*]Dwa tryby gry i 3 poziomy trudności + kilka faktów o danych miejscach które znacząco ułatwiają odgadnięcie lokalizacji [*]Niezłe zdjęcia – tak te charakterystyczne dla danego miejsca jak i te po których można stwierdzić iż jest to „gdziekolwiek” [*]Dla kolekcjonerów 177 osiągnięcia STEAM do odblokowania [/list] Minusy : [list] [*]Niektóre zdjęcia są wykonane w takich miejscach że przypisanie im właściwej lokalizacji graniczy z cudem.. [*]Uciążliwe wpisywanie nazw lokalizacji.. mimo iż wiesz co to za miasto nie znaczy że poprawnie je wpiszesz.. [/list]