Had a lot of hope for this game early on, bought it when it first hit early access to support the devs and see where
Their brilliant plans for the game went. guess those ideas went to the toilet along with the optimization.
The game's own description is "From ONE of the developers behind the original Rainbow Six and Ghost Recon games, comes a thinking-man's first-person shooter" So i pose the question of, who was thinking this constituted a 1.0 release?? So devman, if you worked on AAA games like Rainbow Six and Ghost Recon why didn't you do exactly like your game description of "Take your time. Think ahead. Get the job done." Because all i see is "Get the job done and get rid of it for a quick cash grab"
For anyone wanting to get this game, just don't. i encourage you to look at their early promises as well as their communication with the community on how things are progressing. They led us (the community) to believe this game would in fact come out polished and drastically improved after each build. This isn't early access anymore so you have no excuses for it to play and feel just like some of the earliest builds.
To point out what others have as well, y'all went from 40gb to 100gb you'd think that have some improvements and real content! nope i guess they took the slop it and drop it approach.
Edit! after wasting more of my life on this game after this update, reticle ghosting and artifacting with the EXPS3 is horrible, even if you adjust brightness settings on the reticle itself you're left with the same exact ghosting issue I absolutely CAN'T recommend against this game enough.
I also wanted to add, why the hell are the quality of most assets in this game on par with assets you'd buy from the unity asset store, yet the detail of other irrelevant assets clearly not sourced from an asset store actually half way decent?(looking at you UMP45 GPNVGs in the dark range)
