Godot Engine

Meio que não sei fazer nada pois sou burro, mas é uma ótima engine.

Frankly, Unity needs the competition. Let's leave this hanging: Unreal is effectively the industry standard. It's powerful, it's made using a serious language for actual work that allows for a greater degree of memory management (Rust wasn't in the conversation for most of it's life, let's ignore it for now). It's got nice lighting, powerful elements and extensively powerful. So, this has left Unity in the spot that made me care about it over Unreal Engine; Rapid Prototyping. You [b]can[/b] do nice work and make excellent, polished games. The skill floor is generally lower and so I worked with Unity extensively during my time as a student. It's free, actually comprehensible and the documentation is excellent. Godot just does all that and more. Godot handles much of the same beats just with little benefits, tweaks and additions that makes working with Unity more of a hassle in comparison. At the time of writing, Unity is trying to improve but it still sees it's competition as Unreal, whereas Godot is putting all the money it earned due to Unity's screw-ups into getting better and better. And all for free, open-source software! Most of the paradigm is pretty similar. Instead of Components on empty objects, you have Nodes that are a self-contained object in of itself. They bolt onto Scenes, which can work a little like a Prefab. Then from there, you build out further and further by adding nodes to objects to add each peice of functionality. I find nodes more helpful than components because it feels easiler to reuse nodes. Something about how it's presented makes it much easier to imagine how to make something generic as possible, especially thanks to Godot's pretty handy data system, that allows for powerful management of allsorts of stats a game might want. I also think gdScript is fine. I don't think its better than other languages, but this Python based language is decent enough to get stuff up and running. If you're aiming for a prototype, I do find it helpful enough to get an idea off the ground a lot quicker than Unity's C#, though I do find the integration with an actual IDE more annoying. The one the engine provides is perfectly servicable, where as Mono gets yanked for litterally anything else immediately. You even have more options for languages, like JavaScript if you'd really like, but also C# and C++. The last one being preferable for anything expected to be performant. Again, Unity kinda can do this but Godot has lots of little touches that makes it good at prototyping but then later refining what you have. Being able to write something in C++ later is handy for whatever performance gains you'd like. But there's also greater degrees of indication that the people working on this engine actually use it do make games. Tiny example: there's a function that you can call and it'll not only update the velocity of an object during the physics step, it'll also account for collision for you so you don't have to. Which you otherwise, would need to. Just quick and simple little bits like that which make working in this easier. You can work with Groups and Signals to help decouple your nodes from one another to ensure they don't end up locked together when they shouldn't be. And that's got a window pop-up if you want it. You have more than one way to add UI controls to Nodes so you can adjust each one without making hard values. Loads and loads and loads of them for alsorts of inputs. And now there's an Asset Library, which has plenty of little bits and pieces to get started with. Unity feels like a slog to use in comparison. It feels like I've been waiting for Godot this whole time!

very useful, working on an top-down openworld game called froggo. i also use krita and blender!

好玩

когда надоедает искать во что бы поиграть, задумываешься о том чтобы самостоятельно сделать себе игру :/

i like it, but it's not unreal.