孤高之人

Bu bir 3D yatay platform atlama, parkur gündelik ve macera oyunudur. Profesyonel bir maceracıyı oynayacaksınız ve macera dünyasının en ünlü tehlikeli yeri olan "Gugao"yu fethetmeye gideceksiniz. Yolda çeşitli tuzakları aşmaya çalışın, aksiliklerden korkmayın ve zirveye ulaşana kadar yürüdüğünüz tüm toprakları fethedin.

孤高之人 is one of literally thousands of creatively bankrupt asset flips infesting Steam and lowering the average quality of all video games everywhere. This is somewhat of a joke game where the player takes on the role of a professional adventurer who, after a near-fatal climbing accident, suffers from involuntary limb movements. Despite their condition, they continue to attempt dangerous expeditions, and in this game they venture to conquer the legendary "Apex" mountain. So basically, this is one of those garbage platformers where the developer made the character hard to control on purpose... one of the worst takes on game development you can get. So I guess that's right up there with using a bunch of other people's assets instead of doing the job properly. 孤高之人 is partially or completely made up of stock assets, "borrowed" from asset stores and free asset websites. Little, if anything in this game is the creation of the "developer". While there's no up front price for this asset flip, the other problem with asset flips is that when developers aren't capable of doing their job and creating high quality assets, it's also true they can't do any of the rest of the job of a game developer either. That's definitely true for "孤高之人", and this kind of asset flipping never results in games that have quality or value for PC gamers. There's no English translation for the game, but that's okay. The language of bad games is universal. The game graphics look better than you might expect, but that's just because it looks like some or all of them are "borrowed" from asset stores or wherever. Gamers can tell... and it comes across as insincere. There's also the old adage that those who lack the budget and talent to make their own game assets usually lack the budget and talent to do the rest of the job of game development properly, too. It's free... now, but it wasn't before. The developer was charging $4 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It's a nice gesture for the game to be given away for free, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. It's also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who paid money for this... nobody got refunded. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 5 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.