全托教师

玩不懂

这个考试分数的计算非常奇怪，超过一定的分数会减分，到某个情况会变0，就像是分数和某种参数相乘超出了最大值，但又不像，实在想不明白这逻辑怎么写的。int最大值大得很，不是那么容易突破的，又不是取余数的逻辑，我认为这本来是不应该出现的bug。

挺有意思的设计，但是重复性太高，玩多了会很无聊，结局的联动性做的不太好，上一张图还说世界一流大学，下面了解近况就变成了没考上大学，这里设计的不咋好，但是考虑到后续应该不会更新了而且已经转为免费，还可以吧

有难度的 一开始我以为点数120就是满分了 结果1000居然才满 拼老命也没到500

还行

"全托教师" is a very badly made point and click/menu driven "I Can't Believe It's Not A Webpage" life simulator as you run the lives of some high school students... think The Sims but remove all the visuals, character interaction, home building, and all the rest of the game play. And chuck in some pure cringe e-book writing about the author's imaginary girlfriend. In Chinese. There's no English translation for the game, but that's okay. The language of bad games is universal. For gameplay purposes, because the user interface for this game is mostly just 2D static text/images... it might as well be a web page. It's functionally no different from a browser game. And we all know, Steam isn't here to compete with Chrome and Firefox. If the game can be done in a web browser, it's just not rich or compelling enough to appeal to serious gamers on PC. There's an overwhelming amount of mediocre Visual Novel/E-book style cutscenes in this game. The developers failed one of the most basic, fundamental requirements of game design.. "Show, don't tell." So you'll spend a huge amount of time not playing the game, but clicking through endless lines of poorly written VN text cutscenes because the developers couldn't work out how to relate their narrative through the game mechanics, and decided instead it would be better to compete with reading a book for your time. We're here to play games, not read through hours of garbage intersituals. Your gaming rig is not a Kindle. Visually, this features mediocre hand drawn style "Baby's First Wacom Tablet" art instead of contemporary graphics. This obviously looks better than pixelcrap, but that's a really low bar to barely stumble over. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks worse than a professionally made game would look, and that's a major deterrent. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $5 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 8 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Since free games don't contribute to your game collector badge and other profile stuff, is this a worthwhile addition to your Steam library? I think you should give this one a miss. Although it's free, your time and storage are valuable resources, and the market is filled with superior options.