Fantahouse

발판밟으면 건너가기 (매일 업데이트되지는 않으며, 작성자가 원할 때마다 업데이트됩니다.) [1일차] 다양한 규칙을 가진 방을 클리어해 나갑니다. 시작지점과 끝 지점 사이에 다양한 발판과 장치들이 존재하며, 이들을 활용해 반대편으로 향하여야 하죠. 만약, 방의 바닥으로 추락하게 되면 시작 지점에서 부활해 다시 시도할 수 있습니다. 각 방은 다양한 규칙으로 작동합니다. 이리저리 움직이는 발판이나 회전하는 발판, 길을 막는 기둥 등이 존재하며 이들의 규칙을 파악한 뒤 공략방향을 찾아내야 하죠. 그렇게 규칙 파악하고 진행하면 됩니다. [아쉬운 점] -조작감 진짜.... -점프 판정과 착지가 이상함 -룸마다 컨셉이 바뀌는건 좋지만 규칙이 너무 왔다갔다함 (움직이는 발판에 착지했을때 어떤 스테이지는 캐릭터가 동일하게 이동만 하는대 어떤 스테이지는 캐릭터가 이동을 안해서 발판 이동에 맞춰서 같이 이동을 해야하고 어떤 경우에는 회전까지 해버리고)

"Fantahouse" is a poorly made minimalist low poly 3D action platformer where you go through some incredibly bland, uninspired platformer levels with phoned in graphics and sloppy, unoptimised visuals and technical implementation. It's free, but so is watching already dry beige paint dry. The game is really simple and unambitious in terms of implementation, more of a tech demo or one of those cases where an amateur developer spends $100 to publish something on Steam Direct to see if it's possible. Yes, obviously it's possible. A proof of concept, tech demo, or something that's less than a little blip on the radar isn't offering anything truly valuable to gamers. This game features very lacklustre minimalist "art" for graphics instead of anything remotely contemporary. I'm sure the "developer" thought this would come across as "artistic", but it doesn't, it comes across as "really lazy". Yes, contemporary 3D graphics take a lot of time and effort to create. That doesn't mean it's okay not to bother! Developers must try to understand that gaming is a visual medium, and gamers spend a lot of money on high end gaming rigs for a reason. And that reason is not so they can look at lazy, phoned-in half efforts like this. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 4 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? What's the verdict? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.

фу

ESTA BUENO UN JUEGO