
Colonial Conquest is a conquest simulation set in the Victorian age of warfare and expansion of the late 1800's and early 1900's.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English, French, German, Spanish - Spain, Portuguese - Portugal, Portuguese - Brazil, Russian
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
Gute Variante des Risiko Klassikers. Vor allem als Einzelspieler Spieler interessant. Multiplayerfunktion wäre wünschenswert.
Colonial Conquest, developed by Argonauts Interactive and Collectif Nemoïd and published by Plug In Digital, is a turn-based strategy game that revisits the classic 1985 title with modern touches. Set during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the game immerses players in the age of imperialism, challenging them to expand their nation’s influence across the globe. Players can choose from six major powers—Great Britain, Germany, France, the United States, Japan, or Russia—each with unique strengths and starting positions, tasking them with managing diplomacy, military operations, and strategic planning to achieve global dominance. The historical setting adds a layer of context, making strategic decisions feel grounded in the era of colonial expansion. Gameplay in Colonial Conquest centers around controlling territories, managing resources, and deploying military units to expand influence and defend holdings. The world map is divided into regions and sea zones, each with strategic value, and players must weigh the cost of expansion against potential risks. Beyond straightforward military action, the game introduces mechanics like espionage, sabotage, and bribery, allowing players to weaken rivals without direct conflict. This combination of overt and covert strategies provides depth, encouraging players to consider multiple avenues for achieving their objectives. The game also features scenarios such as the 1880 “Race for the Colonies” and the 1914 “Brink of War,” offering different challenges and conditions that affect strategy and replayability. Visually, the game takes a minimalist approach, prioritizing clarity and functionality over ornate graphics. The map is clean and easy to read, and the user interface is straightforward, which helps players focus on strategy rather than visual flourishes. While this simplicity ensures that actions and territory control are always clear, it may feel dated or underwhelming for players accustomed to more polished modern strategy titles. Sound design follows a similar philosophy, providing subtle music and effects that reinforce the setting without distracting from gameplay. This design choice aligns with the game’s emphasis on strategy and planning rather than cinematic presentation. The pacing and structure of Colonial Conquest make it approachable for both newcomers and seasoned strategy players. Turns are relatively short, allowing for engaging sessions without overwhelming commitment, and the balance between diplomacy, military action, and covert operations keeps gameplay varied. The inclusion of multiple scenarios adds replay value, giving players opportunities to experiment with different strategies and adapt to changing historical circumstances. For those who enjoy methodical planning and tactical problem-solving, these features create a satisfying and rewarding experience. However, the game has some limitations. Its simplicity, while a strength for accessibility, also limits the depth and complexity that some players expect from modern strategy games. The AI can be predictable, and without an online multiplayer mode, the game lacks the dynamic interactions and challenges that human opponents can provide. Additionally, the minimalist presentation, though functional, may not appeal to those seeking visually immersive or highly detailed historical simulations. These factors can make the game feel shallow over extended play sessions, particularly for strategy veterans. In conclusion, Colonial Conquest delivers a solid and accessible strategy experience that successfully modernizes a classic game while maintaining its core appeal. It offers a thoughtful mix of military, diplomatic, and covert gameplay set in a historically grounded era of imperialism. While it may not match the complexity or visual polish of larger-scale strategy titles, it provides a concise and engaging experience for players looking for a turn-based challenge that can be enjoyed in short sessions. Its combination of historical context, strategic depth, and approachable mechanics makes it an enjoyable option for casual and moderately experienced strategy gamers alike. Rating: 6/10
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time.
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
I was expecting a mediocre game. (May be a bit of easy to learn hart to master. The pictures were promising for me) But the game really has no strategic depth at all! It is just like Risk. And here is nothing addictive about it. You only produce on mass units. You can actually attack anywhere No unit variations. No naval battles. No diplomacy No buildings (you can only build a fortress once)
un classique de la strategie ! a l image de Stratego !
It is a very simple game in a way that makes it challenging. This in so nice!
Que d'heures passées sur ce jeu sur mon vieil Atari. L'adaptation Pc est propre
Pros: Very similar to the original. Can get lost in the quick turns. Cons: Computer cheats - The more fortifications you have the more chance you will lose 1. Uprisings that will kill an entire territory no matter how many troops are there. Got a few hundred there eh? Poof. Computers only attacking you even when you aren't in 1st. All you have to do is look at the map for proof. Glitches - My move is invisible and can't be undone because of it. Game breaker! Or prepare to save multiple times every few years because even the saves can become glitched.
no, risk might be better
Дерех зе нихт и алес дезахт
Le jeu préféré de Donald
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.