
A very short tap-and-jump game that brings along some personal complaints.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English, Simplified Chinese
Engagement
Reviews
我们无法一直向前,很多东西不是我们向前进,而是它们向我们过来,我们可以跳起来,在合适的时间,虽然不是所期待的结局
3分,无聊
小学二年级的梦想能坚持到现在,已经非常难得了 不过我真的希望终点能有点什么...&过了最大的坎之后能一命完成这个跳跳乐我真是太棒了😀
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Hours played at review time, across 32 reviews with recorded playtime.
人就要像方块一样,一直向前
Честно вообще не понял почему у этой игры столько положительных обзоров. По факту мы имеем простейший платформер уровня "нарисовано в Paint", да есть какой-то скрытый смысл, но прописан он криво и это трэш из разряда по типу игры в которой, если чистить зубы 2 минуты, то тебя телепортирует куда-то непонятно куда. Прохождение игры занимает 5 минут, если не торопится, я облазил ее со всех мест, но честно вообще не понял, зачем и почему. Вопреки большинству, не могу рекомендовать.
"Always Forward" is a garbage minimal one-button endless runner that makes Flappy Bird look like 4D chess. It was dumped on Steam as a joke, from what I can tell, the developer even admits there's nothing to this in terms of meaningful gameplay, it's not in any way a contribution to the gaming industry and has no value for gamers. What do you do in the game? Press one button to jump over the gaps. This game features very lacklustre minimalist "art" for graphics instead of anything remotely contemporary. I'm sure the "developer" thought this would come across as "artistic", but it doesn't, it comes across as "really lazy". Yes, contemporary 3D graphics take a lot of time and effort to create. That doesn't mean it's okay not to bother! Developers must try to understand that gaming is a visual medium, and gamers spend a lot of money on high end gaming rigs for a reason. And that reason is not so they can look at lazy, phoned-in half efforts like this. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. The poor quality of this game is also reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the game all-time peak user count was only ONE person. That's right, only one person ever used this at a time. When I tried this for the purposes of reviewing it, I equalled the peak user count for the product. OUCH. The only user activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 130 million gamers on Steam and well over 100,000 games for gamers to choose from, the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality product is to be expected. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? This is a hard pass. There's no immediate financial commitment, but there are thousands of more compelling games on the platform that will give you a lot more enjoyment for your time. [b]Note: Joke reviews[/b] Because this is more of a "joke" game, intended to draw attention from controversy or in the hopes of going viral because it's "so bad it's good" (but it isn't good at all), there's nothing here to offer to serious gamers. As usual, with most awful/joke games, all the comedians come out of the woodwork. The vast majority of the reviews for this game are joke reviews, mocking the game for just how bad it is. The comedians give us the usual "this game cured my cancer, saved my marriage, changed my life" story... sarcastic, but not useful if you want to know if the game is worth it. Because most of the reviews are as insincere as the game itself is, the positive review score for this game should not be considered an accurate representation of the quality of the game.
免费 有中文 没成就
Je n'ai pas aimé ce jeu. En soit, le côté ennuyeux et désorientant est réussi, cela dit, le gameplay ne l'est pas. Explications ci-dessous. Il est difficile de doser la distance que le carré que l'on contrôle parcourt, et qui plus est, le terrain sur lequel le carré avance est parsemé d'embûches que j’appellerai ici des "bugs" pour la simple raison que ces embûches ne sont aucunement représentées, pas même par un changement de couleur du décor, ce qui me pousse donc à admettre que ces micro-sauts que le carré effectue sont donc dus à des bugs plutôt qu'à une fonctionnalité initialement prévue. S'il y avait des points de contrôle permettant de sauver sa progression, passe encore, mais malheureusement, il n'en est rien ; à chaque chute dans un trou, le jeu nous fait recommencer depuis le début. Si je cherche à perdre mon temps, j'aime le faire correctement, et cette fois-ci, je n'ai pas pu y avoir droit. Note finale : 3,5/20
short fun game if you want english make sure to press the 2nd button and then click the button labelled english then enjoy :)
游戏输了可以重新开始 但现实没这么简单
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.