100 Cats Lost In Canada Find & Color

AI SLOP. I played the game through to the end, but the longer I played, the more I'm convinced it wasn't made by a human... There were weird little mistakes with the artwork, but i tried to give them the benefit of the doubt and continued. But the colouring part was just so weird, I genuinely don't believe it was designed by human choices or it must've been a person with a very "special" brain. It's hard to describe it in words and coherent sentences since i'm quite sleep deprived, but i'll try - Firstly, there were nearly 200 different colours. Most of them had 1-2 areas to fill, but some colours were identical to each other (for example, there was one yellow coat, but two different "paint buckets"). This easily could've been brought down to less than 100 buckets. I just realised you can even see this ssue in the example on the storepage description, the video with the turtle (27 and 70 being the same colour). - The areas you colour in don't make sense. You'd think it'd just follow the lineart, but it doesn't. Sometimes it pastes shapes together and draws over the lineart, sometimes it splits a shape into 3 even though it's all the same colour number. - Areas don't always really correspond to the colour you've selected. You paint it with this "red" bucket, and the area turns out to be actually gray. I'd understand it if the game just added extra details like shadows, but it was just straight up another colour. It's just so inconsistent with its choices. One railing would be split into two colours, the one right next to it would just be 1 click despite being the exact same. - i'm not good at recognising ai generated music, which a different reviews have claimed, but i am inclined to believe that. The songs sound like generic k-pop and other pop-songs, but instead of words they just sing "meow". The quality of the game and the music don't match up, i doubt they recorded and produced those songs themself. Afterward i went to take a closer look at the steampage and the studio. The community tab is weirdly active under the screenshot posts, which suspect they're mostly bots. The tags aren't true to the game either: "puzzle platformer", "incremental"... Also, the images shown in the trailer and screenshots aren't from this specific 100 cats version. The studio has multiple upcoming games that are all over the place in style and genre, which isn't necessarily something bad (rather impressive if it's actually real), but they all look like typical art styles that ai would generate. Especially the tokyo shop similator for example... even in the promo pics the style is inconsistent. All of this to say, don't recommend it. It feels very icky, especially when the description talks about "Hand-drawn scenes". I wouldn't have found it such a problem if they weren't trying to pass it off as human-made. Such cowardly behaviour, at least own up to it and be honest about it. Even if we assume no AI was used, it's still a poorly made game.